|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 The Robert Graham Center, American Academy of Family Physicians, Washington, DC
2 Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minn
3 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: George E. Fryer, PhD The Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Practice and Primary Care 1350 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20036 Efryer{at}aafp.org
BACKGROUND We wanted to quantify how the location in which medical care is delivered in the United States varies with the sociodemographic characteristics and health care arrangements of the individual person.
Methods Data from the 1996 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) were used to estimate the number of persons per 1,000 per month in 1996 who had at least 1 contact with physicians offices, hospital outpatient departments, or emergency departments, hospitals, or home care. These data were stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, household income, education of head of household, residence in or out of metropolitan statistical areas, having health insurance, and having a usual source of care.
Results Physicians offices were overwhelmingly the most common site of health care for all subgroups studied. Lacking a usual source of care was the only variable independently associated with a decreased likelihood of care in all 5 settings, and lack of insurance was associated with lower rates of care in all settings but emergency departments. Generally, more complicated patterns emerged for most sociodemographic characteristics. The combination of having a usual source of care and health insurance was especially related to higher rates of care in all settings except the emergency department.
Conclusion Frequency and location of health care delivery varies substantially with sociodemographic characteristics, insurance, and having a usual source of care. Understanding this variation can inform public consideration of policy related to access to care.
Key Words: Medical Economics Delivery of Health Care Demography Demographic and Health Surveys Ecology
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-K. Soler, I. Okkes, M. Wood, and H. Lamberts The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care Fam. Pract., August 1, 2008; 25(4): 312 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Ferrer Pursuing Equity: Contact With Primary Care and Specialist Clinicians by Demographics, Insurance, and Health Status Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2007; 5(6): 492 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange and W. R. Phillips In This Issue: Real Change Is Real Hard in the Real World Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2007; 5(2): 98 - 100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Task Force 1 Writing Group, L. A. Green, R. Graham, B. Bagley, C. M. Kilo, S. J. Spann, S. P. Bogdewic, and J. Swanson Task Force 1. Report of the Task Force on Patient Expectations, Core Values, Reintegration, and the New Model of Family Medicine Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(suppl_1): S33 - S50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Phillips 'The Expert ... Is the Patient in Front of Us' Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2003; 1(3): 177 - 179. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange In This Issue: Health Care Inequalities Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2003; 1(2): 66 - 67. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. White Two Cheers for Ecology Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2003; 1(2): 67 - 69. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |