Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 1:196-202 (2003)
© 2003 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.31

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karasz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roybal, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karasz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roybal, K.

Article

Women’s Experiences of Abnormal Cervical Cytology: Illness Representations, Care Processes, and Outcomes

Alison Karasz, PhD1, M. Diane McKee, MD1 and Krista Roybal, MD2

1 Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
2 Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Alison Karasz, PhD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 3544 Jerome Ave, Bronx, NY 10467, akkarasz{at}montefiore.org

BACKGROUND We wanted to explore the conceptual representations of illness and experiences with care among women who have learned of an abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear result.

METHODS The study took place in 2 primary care, family practice clinics serving low-income, multiethnic patients in the Bronx, New York City. We conducted qualitative, semistructured telephone interviews with 17 patients who had recently learned of abnormal findings on a Pap smear. After a preliminary coding phase, the investigators identified 2 important outcomes: distress and dissatisfaction with care, and factors affecting these outcomes. A model was developed on a subset of the data, which was then tested on each transcript with an explicit search for disconfirming cases. A revised coding scheme conforming to the dimensions of the model was used to recode transcripts.

RESULTS Women reported complex, syncretic models of illness that included both biomedical and folk elements. Many concerns, especially nonbiomedical concerns, were not addressed in interactions with physicians. An important source of both distress and dissatisfaction with care was the women’s lack of understanding of the inherent ambiguity of Pap smear results. When perceived care needs, which included emotional support as well as information, were not met, distress and dissatisfaction were greatly increased.

CONCLUSION In this study, patients’ illness models and expectations of care were not routinely addressed in their conversations with physicians about abnormal Pap smear results. When physicians can take the time to review patients’ illness models carefully, distress and dissatisfaction with care can be reduced considerably.

Key Words: Patient satisfaction • attitude to health • illness beliefs • qualitative research • women’s health • Papanicolaou test




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
Provocative Questions
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 84 - 86.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
L. S. Acheson
In This Issue: Cervical Cancer Screening
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2003; 1(4): 194 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Much Needed Feedback
Lucy M. Candib
Annals of Family Medicine, 26 Nov 2003 [Full text]
Pseudopathology in abnormal Pap smears
Joseph E Scherger
Annals of Family Medicine, 9 Dec 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Annals of Family Medicine.