HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, M. Articles by Barry, H. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, M. Articles by Barry, H. C.

Periodic Abstinence From Pap (PAP) Smear Study: Women’s Perceptions of Pap Smear Screening

Department of Family Practice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Mindy Smith, MD, MS, Department of Family Practice, B-100 Clinical Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, smithm69{at}msu.edu

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to explore attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers to risk-based cervical cancer screening through focus group interviews of patients.

METHODS We conducted 8 focus group interviews of women using semistructured interviews. The investigators independently reviewed the focus group transcripts and identified the overall themes and themes unique to each question using an immersion and crystallization approach.

RESULTS Women are in agreement that cervical cancer screening is important and that women should get Pap smears regularly as an important way of protecting their health. They are not open to the idea of reducing the frequency of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, however, because they perceive annual screening to be successful in reducing cervical cancer mortality. Additionally, they have concerns about test accuracy. Women are distrustful of the rationale for reducing the frequency of Pap smears. Women’s previous bad experiences have reinforced their need for self-advocacy.

CONCLUSION Women are reluctant to engage in risk-based cervical cancer screening. In this environment, risk-based cervical cancer screening recommendations are likely to be met with resistance.

Key Words: Attitude to health • cervix neoplasms/diagnosis • community health care • health promotion • mass screening • Papanicolaou test • practice-based research • public health • qualitative research

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Coughlin, E. S. Breslau, T. Thompson, and V. B. Benard Physician Recommendation for Papanicolaou Testing Among U.S. Women, 2000 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1143 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Breitkopf, J. Catero, J. Jaccard, and A. B. Berenson Psychological and Sociocultural Perspectives on Follow-up of Abnormal Papanicolaou Results Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1347 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Women's Thoughts on Less Frequent Pap Testing Journal Watch Women's Health, March 10, 2004; 2004(310): 3 - 3. [Full Text]

				K. C. Stange Provocative Questions Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 84 - 86. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Acheson In This Issue: Cervical Cancer Screening Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2003; 1(4): 194 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: