Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:22-25 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.38

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, R.
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, R.
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, L. I.

Article

Is Making Smoking Status a Vital Sign Sufficient to Increase Cessation Support Actions in Clinical Practice?

Raymond Boyle, PhD and Leif I. Solberg, MD

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Raymond Boyle, PhD, HealthPartners Research Foundation, 8100 34th Ave South, PO Box 1524, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, raymond.boyle{at}healthpartners.com

BACKGROUND There is widespread belief that adding smoking status to the list of vital signs in medical practice will lead to an increased likelihood that physicians will offer more cessation support for smokers during office visits. This article evaluates the impact of introducing routine use of smoking status as a vital sign on clinician cessation support in a primary care setting.

METHODS A total of 429 adult health plan members who were smokers and recent quitters from 2 primary care clinics in Minneapolis, Minn, were administered a 28-item questionnaire by telephone. The instrument included questions about patient health status, smoking status, advice about smoking, clinic actions during the most recent visit, satisfaction with clinic actions, and intention to change smoking. Comparisons were made with a cohort of smoking patients before and after smoking status was used as a vital sign, using 2-tailed t tests for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables.

RESULTS Patient self-report of receiving advice about smoking in the past year (about 66%) was unchanged after smoking status was implemented as a vital sign. Medical chart documentation of tobacco use increased from 38.0% to 78.4% of all encounters, whereas documentation of advice about smoking decreased from 33.5% to 18.8%. Except for identification of tobacco use before implementation of the guideline, none of the specific activities recommended in the guideline occurred at very high levels.

CONCLUSION Implementing smoking status as a vital sign appears to have increased the documentation of tobacco use but had little effect on specific implementation actions. Overall, the findings suggest that more consistent identification of tobacco use alone will not lead to guideline-recommended changes in cessation support actions by clinicians. Greater environmental changes will be needed if tobacco guideline goals are to be achieved.

Key Words: Signs and symptoms • clinical practice patterns • physician’s practice patterns • smoking • smoking cessation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. E Sherman
A framework for tobacco control: lessons learnt from Veterans Health Administration
BMJ, May 3, 2008; 336(7651): 1016 - 1019.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
S. F. Rothemich, S. H. Woolf, R. E. Johnson, A. E. Burgett, S. K. Flores, D. W. Marsland, and J. S. Ahluwalia
Effect on Cessation Counseling of Documenting Smoking Status as a Routine Vital Sign: An ACORN Study
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 60 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. N. Thorndike, S. Regan, and N. A. Rigotti
The Treatment of Smoking by US Physicians During Ambulatory Visits: 1994 2003
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 97(10): 1878 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
R. E. Glasgow, S. Emont, and D. C. Miller
Assessing delivery of the five 'As' for patient-centered counseling
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2006; 21(3): 245 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
N. A. Maizlish, J. Ruland, M. E. Rosinski, and K. Hendry
A systems-based intervention to promote smoking as a vital sign in patients served by community health centers.
American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 2006; 21(3): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
J. J. Sherman
The Impact of Smoking and Quitting Smoking on Patients With Diabetes
Diabetes Spectr, October 1, 2005; 18(4): 202 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
On TRACK
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 177 - 179.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In this Issue: Multimethod Research
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 2 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Role for quality improvment processes
Alice S. Petrulis
Annals of Family Medicine, 27 Jan 2004 [Full text]
Raise the Flag of Relationships
William L. Miller, MD, MA
Annals of Family Medicine, 28 Jan 2004 [Full text]
Smoking as a vital sign just the first step
Abigail C Halperin
Annals of Family Medicine, 16 Mar 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.