| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Article |
1 Department of Educational Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Neb
2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
3 Office of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Neb
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: John W. Creswell, PhD, Department of Educational Psychology, 241 Teachers College Bldg, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, jcreswell1{at}unl.edu
BACKGROUND Mixed methods or multimethod research holds potential for rigorous, methodologically sound investigations in primary care. The objective of this study was to use criteria from the literature to evaluate 5 mixed methods studies in primary care and to advance 3 models useful for designing such investigations.
METHODS We first identified criteria from the social and behavioral sciences to analyze mixed methods studies in primary care research. We then used the criteria to evaluate 5 mixed methods investigations published in primary care research journals.
RESULTS Of the 5 studies analyzed, 3 included a rationale for mixing based on the need to develop a quantitative instrument from qualitative data or to converge information to best understand the research topic. Quantitative data collection involved structured interviews, observational checklists, and chart audits that were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical procedures. Qualitative data consisted of semistructured interviews and field observations that were analyzed using coding to develop themes and categories. The studies showed diverse forms of priority: equal priority, qualitative priority, and quantitative priority. Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative data gathered both concurrently and sequentially. The integration of the quantitative and qualitative data in these studies occurred between data analysis from one phase and data collection from a subsequent phase, while analyzing the data, and when reporting the results.
DISCUSSION We recommend instrument-building, triangulation, and data transformation models for mixed methods designs as useful frameworks to add rigor to investigations in primary care. We also discuss the limitations of our study and the need for future research.
Key Words: Research design/methods • data collection, methods • investigative techniques • social sciences • qualitative research
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. R. Shield, R. E. Goldman, D. A. Anthony, N. Wang, R. J. Doyle, and J. Borkan Gradual Electronic Health Record Implementation: New Insights on Physician and Patient Adaptation Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2010; 8(4): 316 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. L. Plano Clark The Adoption and Practice of Mixed Methods: U.S. Trends in Federally Funded Health-Related Research Qualitative Inquiry, July 1, 2010; 16(6): 428 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. G. O'Donovan, P. Armstrong, M. C. Byrne, A. W. Murphy, and on behalf of the Donegal Specialist Training Progr A mixed-methods prospective study of death certification in general practice Fam. Pract., June 1, 2010; 27(3): 351 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. L. Leech, A. B. Dellinger, K. B. Brannagan, and H. Tanaka Evaluating Mixed Research Studies: A Mixed Methods Approach Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2010; 4(1): 17 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Townsend, J. Floersch, and R. L. Findling The Conceptual Adequacy of the Drug Attitude Inventory for Measuring Youth Attitudes Toward Psychotropic Medications: A Mixed Methods Evaluation Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2010; 4(1): 32 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Curry, I. M. Nembhard, and E. H. Bradley Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): 1442 - 1452. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Nichols, C. L. Holt, M. Shipp, M. Eloubeidi, M. N. Fouad, and K. Britt Physician Knowledge, Perceptions of Barriers, and Patient Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2009; 24(2): 116 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Woolley Meeting the Mixed Methods Challenge of Integration in a Sociological Study of Structure and Agency Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2009; 3(1): 7 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G. Stineman, P. M. Rist, and J. P. Burke Through the Clinician's Lens: Objective and Subjective Views of Disability Qual Health Res, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 17 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Rauscher and B. H Greenfield Advancements in Contemporary Physical Therapy Research: Use of Mixed Methods Designs Physical Therapy, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 91 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. L. Plano Clark, C. A. Huddleston-Casas, S. L. Churchill, D. O'Neil Green, and A. L. Garrett Mixed Methods Approaches in Family Science Research Journal of Family Issues, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 1543 - 1566. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Taylor Substance Use and Abuse: Women's Criminal Reoffending in New Zealand Affilia, May 1, 2008; 23(2): 167 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. O'Cathain, E. Murphy, and J. Nicholl The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 92 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Mendlinger and J. Cwikel Spiraling Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Women's Health Behaviors: A Double Helix Model for Mixed Methods Qual Health Res, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 280 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. I. Solberg Improving Medical Practice: A Conceptual Framework Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Handley, C. Hall, E. Sanford, E. Diaz, E. Gonzalez-Mendez, K. Drace, R. Wilson, M. Villalobos, and M. Croughan Globalization, Binational Communities, and Imported Food Risks: Results of an Outbreak Investigation of Lead Poisoning in Monterey County, California Am J Public Health, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 900 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. K. Barg, R. Huss-Ashmore, M. N. Wittink, G. F. Murray, H. R. Bogner, and J. J. Gallo A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Loneliness and Depression in Older Adults J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, November 1, 2006; 61(6): S329 - S339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Katerndahl and B. Crabtree Creating innovative research designs: the 10-year methodological think tank case study. Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2006; 4(5): 443 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange, B. F. Crabtree, and W. L. Miller Publishing Multimethod Research Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 292 - 294. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. I. Solberg, A. L. Crain, J. M. Sperl-Hillen, M. C. Hroscikoski, K. I. Engebretson, and P. J. O'Connor Care Quality and Implementation of the Chronic Care Model: A Quantitative Study Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Sussman, R. L. Williams, R. Leverence, P. W. Gloyd Jr, B. F. Crabtree, and On Behalf Of Rios Net Clinicians The Art and Complexity of Primary Care Clinicians' Preventive Counseling Decisions: Obesity as a Case Study Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 327 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. McEvoy and D. Richards A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2006; 11(1): 66 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange On TRACK Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 177 - 179. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange In this Issue: Multimethod Research Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Borkan Mixed Methods Studies: A Foundation for Primary Care Research Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 4 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
