HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Killip, S. Articles by Pearce, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Killip, S. Articles by Pearce, K.

What Is an Intracluster Correlation Coefficient? Crucial Concepts for Primary Care Researchers

¹ Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky
² Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Shersten Killip, MD, MPH, K-302 Kentucky Clinic 0284, 740 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536-0284, skill2{at}email.uky.edu

BACKGROUND Primary care research often involves clustered samples in which subjects are randomized at a group level but analyzed at an individual level. Analyses that do not take this clustering into account may report significance where none exists. This article explores the causes, consequences, and implications of cluster data.

METHODS Using a case study with accompanying equations, we show that clustered samples are not as statistically efficient as simple random samples.

RESULTS Similarity among subjects within preexisting groups or clusters reduces the variability of responses in a clustered sample, which erodes the power to detect true differences between study arms. This similarity is expressed by the intracluster correlation coefficient, or (rho), which compares the within-group variance with the between-group variance. Rho is used in equations along with the cluster size and the number of clusters to calculate the effective sample size (ESS) in a clustered design. The ESS should be used to calculate power in the design phase of a clustered study. Appropriate accounting for similarities among subjects in a cluster almost always results in a net loss of power, requiring increased total subject recruitment. Increasing the number of clusters enhances power more efficiently than does increasing the number of subjects within a cluster.

CONCLUSIONS Primary care research frequently uses clustered designs, whether consciously or unconsciously. Researchers must recognize and understand the implications of clusters to avoid costly sample size errors.

Key Words: Statistics • cluster analysis • data interpretation, research design • primary care • practice-based research • methods/quantitative • theory

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Roubideaux, C. Noonan, J. H. Goldberg, S. L. Valdez, T. L. Brown, S. M. Manson, and K. Acton Relation Between the Level of American Indian and Alaska Native Diabetes Education Program Services and Quality-of-Care Indicators Am J Public Health, November 1, 2008; 98(11): 2079 - 2084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Bentzen, A Bergland, and L Forsen Risk of hip fractures in soft protected, hard protected, and unprotected falls Inj. Prev., October 1, 2008; 14(5): 306 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brown, M. D. Sobsey, and D. Loomis Local Drinking Water Filters Reduce Diarrheal Disease in Cambodia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Ceramic Water Purifier Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2008; 79(3): 394 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Brown, T Hofer, A Johal, R Thomson, J Nicholl, B D Franklin, and R J Lilford An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. van Weel, E. van Weel-Baumgarten, and J. Mold The Importance of Longitudinal Studies in Family Medicine: Experiences of Two Practice-based Research Networks J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M. Chen, G. E. Fryer Jr., and T. E. Norris Effects of Comorbidity and Clustering upon Referrals in Primary Care J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2005; 18(6): 449 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange and W. L. Miller In This Issue: The Patient Voice, Clinical Research, Clustered Data, and the Wonca Research Conference Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 194 - 197. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Zyzanski, S. A. Flocke, and L. M. Dickinson On the Nature and Analysis of Clustered Data Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 199 - 200. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: