Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:253-259 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.81

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Capperino, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Capperino, C.

What Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners Say About Health and Health Care

Bruce Barrett, MD, PhD1, Lucille Marchand, MD1, Jo Scheder, PhD2, Diane Appelbaum, RN, C-NP, MS3, Mary Beth Plane, MSSW, PHD1, Joseph Blustein, MD, MPH4, Rob Maberry, BA1 and Christina Capperino, BS5

1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisc
2 University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisc
3 Emory University, Atlanta, Ga
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisc
5 University of Wisconsin Medical Schoool, Madison, Wisc

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Bruce Barrett, MD, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 777 South Mills, Madison, WI 53715, bbarrett{at}fammed.wisc.edu

BACKGROUND We wanted to explore the beliefs and practices of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners.

METHODS A representative sample of local CAM practitioners was selected for 32 face-to-face in-depth interviews. Interviews were taped, transcribed, and reviewed by all coauthors. Analysis and interpretation were reached by consensus, using an iterative process in multidisciplinary group meetings.

RESULTS The CAM practitioners interviewed stressed the holistic, empowering, and person-centered nature of CAM. They described themselves as healers, employing attentiveness, touch, and love to increase self-awareness and strengthen the healing process, usually in chronic illness, often with pain. They affirmed goodwill and respect toward conventional medicine, calling for greater integration of conventional and complementary health care; however, they identified the major differences of conventional medicine and several formidable barriers. They displayed concern about accessibility issues in health care and stressed that attitudes and beliefs were often larger impediments to integration than were economic or scientific considerations.

CONCLUSIONS In general, CAM practitioners want to work with physicians and other conventional health care workers in seeking a holistic, accessible, patient-centered, integrated health care system.

Key Words: Alternative medicine • complementary medicine • integrated health care • in-depth interviews • qualitative methods




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
C. Hsu, W. R. Phillips, K. J. Sherman, R. Hawkes, and D. C. Cherkin
Healing in Primary Care: A Vision Shared by Patients, Physicians, Nurses, and Clinical Staff
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2008; 6(4): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange and W. L. Miller
In This Issue: The Patient Voice, Clinical Research, Clustered Data, and the Wonca Research Conference
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(3): 194 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.