Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:294-300 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.101

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendixes
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow TRACK Comments: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roetzheim, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Krischer, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roetzheim, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Krischer, J. P.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers

Richard G. Roetzheim, MD, MSPH1,2, Lisa K. Christman, BS1, Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD2, Alan B. Cantor, PhD2, Jennifer Schroeder, BS1, Rania Abdulla, BS1, Seft Hunter, MA1, Thomas N. Chirikos, PhD2 and Jeffrey P. Krischer, PhD2

1 Department of Family Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
2 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Fla

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Richard Roetzheim, MD, Department of Family Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd. MDC 13, Tampa, FL 33612, rroetzhe{at}hsc.usf.edu

BACKGROUND We assessed the efficacy of the Cancer Screening Office Systems (Cancer SOS), an intervention designed to increase cancer screening in primary care settings serving disadvantaged populations.

METHODS Eight primary care clinics participating in a county-funded health insurance plan in Hillsborough County, Fla, agreed to take part in a cluster-randomized experimental trial. The Cancer SOS had 2 components: a cancer-screening checklist with chart stickers that indicated whether specific cancer-screening tests were due, ordered, or completed; and a division of office responsibilities to achieve high screening rates. Established patients were eligible if they were between the ages of 50 and 75 years and had no contraindication for screening. Data abstracted from charts of independent samples collected at baseline (n = 1,196) and at a 12-month follow-up (n = 1,237) was used to assess whether the patient was up-to-date on one or more of the following cancer-screening tests: mammogram, Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT).

RESULTS In multivariate analysis that controlled for baseline screening rates, secular trends, and other patient and clinic characteristics, the intervention increased the odds of mammograms (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–9.78, P = .023) and fecal occult blood tests (OR = 2.5, 95% CI, 1.65–4.0, P <.0001) with a trend toward greater use of Pap smears (OR = 1.57, 95% CI, 0.92–2.64, P = .096).

CONCLUSIONS The Cancer SOS intervention significantly increased rates of cancer screening among primary care clinics serving disadvantaged populations. The Cancer SOS intervention is one option for providers or policy makers who wish to address cancer related health disparities.

Key Words: Mass screening • mammography • vaginal smears • occult blood • breast neoplasms • colorectal neoplasms • community health centers • primary health care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
W. P. Newton
Improving Performance in Prevention
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 258 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. W. Dexheimer, T. R. Talbot, D. L. Sanders, S. T. Rosenbloom, and D. Aronsky
Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 311 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. M. Murray, S. L. Pals, J. L. Blitstein, C. M. Alfano, and J. Lehman
Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Review of Current Practices
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2008; 100(7): 483 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Shankaran, J. M. McKoy, N. Dandade, N. Nonzee, C. A. Tigue, C. L. Bennett, and T. D. Denberg
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of a Low-Intensity Patient-Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5248 - 5253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. Reh, K. A. Romero, A. B. Flood, and M. L. Beach
Translation of an Efficacious Cancer-Screening Intervention to Women Enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2007; 5(4): 320 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. J. Dietrich, J. N. Tobin, A. Cassells, C. M. Robinson, M. A. Greene, C. H. Sox, M. L. Beach, K. N. DuHamel, and R. G. Younge
Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial.
Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 563 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 98 - 99.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
R. G. Roetzheim, L. K. Christman, P. B. Jacobsen, J. Schroeder, R. Abdulla, and S. Hunter
Long-term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
Questions, Interpretation, Exhortation
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 514 - 517.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: Practice Change and Patient Safety
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2004; 2(4): 290 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Use of Annals web resources
Allen J. Dietrich
Annals of Family Medicine, 31 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Editor's Response to: Re: Use of Annals web resources
Kurt C. Stange
Annals of Family Medicine, 31 Jul 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.