Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 2:509-511 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.115

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buetow, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buetow, S. A.

Essay

Towards a New Understanding of Provider Continuity

Stephen A. Buetow, PhD

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Stephen A. Buetow, PhD, Department of General Practice and Primary, Health Care, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 1004, s.buetow{at}auckland.ac.nz

ABSTRACT

Provider continuity is in need of an expanded definition that is not exclusively clinician centered. Currently, provider continuity is defined by visits over time to the same clinician. Many patients and informal caregivers, however, are co-providers of health care, not merely consumers. As a result, provider continuity will not happen if there is a lack of consistency in who attends with or for the patient during successive visits. Such fragmentation may weaken knowledge of the patient and information exchange. Consequently, there is a need to redefine provider continuity to mean that the same attendees visit the same clinician(s), service, or facility as an uninterrupted succession of events. More than semantic quibbling, the proposed reconceptualization challenges the foundation of family medicine in terms of the values and language by which the discipline defines itself in clinician-centered ways. The change required has implications for practice and research.

Key Words: Continuity of patient care • health care providers • caregivers • theory • delivery of health care • health services research • family systems




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
S Buetow and G Elwyn
Are patients morally responsible for their errors?
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 260 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
S. A. Buetow
To Care Is to Coprovide
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2005; 3(6): 553 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In this Issue: The Patient-Clinician Relationship and Practice-Based Network Research
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 386 - 387.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Moving from clinician to patient-centric continuity
Jeffrey Borkan
Annals of Family Medicine, 17 Nov 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.