Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 2:S17-S22 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.148
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Maeseneer, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Maeseneer, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by De Sutter, A.

Why Research in Family Medicine? A Superfluous Question

Jan M. De Maeseneer, MD, PhD and An De Sutter, MD

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Belgium

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jan De Maeseneer, MD, PhD, Department of General Practice, and Primary Health Care, UZ - 1K3 - De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium, jan.demaeseneer{at}ugent.be

The ultimate answer to the question, "Why research in family medicine?" is to provide better care for our patients. Through research we want to improve quality of primary care by improving our understanding and practice of it. This research will inevitably be specific for family medicine as family medicine is a specific discipline. In this article we first explore what makes family medicine a specific discipline. In a second part we present a framework to grasp the various research questions that must be answered to achieve the complex and multifaceted goal of improving quality of care.

Family medicine is a specific discipline for 3 reasons: it has a unique epidemiology, the context of care is important, and it has a strong link and responsibility to the community.

Quality of care is a complex and multidimensional concept that raises diverse research questions. We propose to map these questions within a framework defined by the 3 dimensions of the Donabedian triangle—structure, process, and outcome—and within each of these dimensions by 5 foci—basic knowledge, diagnostic and therapeutic problem solving, practice implementation, policy context, and education. This framework may help to make the various research questions operational and to point out the gaps in our research.

The questions and answers should be relevant to daily practice and comprise all domains of family medicine so that eventually most of our daily actions in practice will be underpinned with medical, contextual, and policy evidence and contribute to the improvement of the quality of care.

Key Words: Family practice • research • quality assessment/health care • education




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. Dawes and B. Delaney
Review articles on research methods for family practice researchers
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 489 - 489.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
C. van Weel and W. W. Rosser
Improving Health Care Globally: A Critical Review of the Necessity of Family Medicine Research and Recommendations to Build Research Capacity
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(suppl_2): S5 - S16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
L. A. Green
The Research Domain of Family Medicine
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2004; 2(suppl_2): S23 - S29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.