HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Comments: Submit a response TRACK Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baik, S.-Y. Articles by Susman, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baik, S.-Y. Articles by Susman, J. L.

The Recognition of Depression: The Primary Care Clinician’s Perspective

¹ College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
² Australian Catholic University-Australia, Faculty of Health, North Sydney, Australia
³ University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisc
⁴ College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Seong-Yi Baik, PhD, University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, 262 Procter Hall, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0038, seongyi.baik{at}uc.edu

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to explore the responses of primary care clinicians to patients who complain of symptoms that might indicate depression, to examine the clinical strategies used by clinicians to recognize depression, and to identify the conditions that influence their ability to do so.

METHODS The grounded theory method was used for data collection and analysis. In-depth, in-person interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 8 clinicians. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed.

RESULTS This study identified 3 processes clinicians engage in to recognize depression—ruling out, opening the door, and recognizing the person—and 3 conditions—familiarity with the patient, general clinical experience, and time availability—that influence how each of the processes is used.

CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of accurately diagnosing depression and the timeliness of the diagnosis are highly influenced by the conditions within which clinicians practice. Productivity expectations in primary care will continue to undermine the identification and treatment of depression if they fail to take into consideration the factors that influence such care.

Key Words: Depression • primary health care

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-Y. Baik, B. J. Bowers, L. D. Oakley, and J. L. Susman What Comprises Clinical Experience in Recognizing Depression?: The Primary Care Clinician's Perspective J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2008; 21(3): 200 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Zink, L. Levin, P. Wollan, and F. Putnam Mothers' Comfort with Screening Questions about Sensitive Issues, Including Domestic Violence. J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 358 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Greer and R. Halgin Predictors of physician-patient agreement on symptom etiology in primary care. Psychosom Med, March 1, 2006; 68(2): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange Stimulus, Response, Interpretation Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 177 - 179. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange In This Issue Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. de Gruy III Depression Research in Primary Care: Pushing the Field Forward Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: