HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Comments: Submit a response TRACK Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meadows, L. M. Articles by Lagendyk, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meadows, L. M. Articles by Lagendyk, L.

Women’s Perceptions of Future Risk After Low-Energy Fractures at Midlife

University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Lynn M. Meadows, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1, meadows{at}ucalgary.ca

PURPOSE Low-energy fractures experienced by women at midlife and beyond place them at increased risk of future fractures and may be early indicators of low bone density. We report here on women’s postfracture narratives to provide insight into how family physicians might tailor their messages to patients in communicating risk.

METHODS An interview guide was used in face-to-face interviews with women aged 40 years and older. Patients were asked to describe their fracture experience and recovery during the subsequent year. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was done initially using an immersion-crystallization approach.

RESULTS Twenty-two women participated in this research. The analysis showed women’s reactions to information about their risk fell into 3 groups. The first took a laissez faire approach, preferring to wait and see what the future held. The second group recognized some of the things they should be doing but were inconsistent in maintaining changes or seeking relevant information. The third group saw information about future risk as salient and important to their daily lives. They actively sought out information, including discussions with their family physicians.

CONCLUSIONS Discovering whether patients have had an injury and, if so, how they perceive future risk is important because the invisibility of this health hazard calls for vigilance early on in women’s lives. Family physicians can help patients move from perceiving the fractures as isolated accidents to understanding them as indicators of future risk by discussing the importance of bone health in the short and long term.

Key Words: Fractures/prevention & control • osteoporosis • primary health care • women’s health • middle aged • integration of health and health care • health education • health promotion, qualitative research

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Frich, L. Ose, K. Malterud, and P. Fugelli Perceived Vulnerability to Heart Disease in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Qualitative Interview Study Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 198 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Acheson Bone Density and the Risk of Fractures: Should Treatment Thresholds Vary by Race? JAMA, May 4, 2005; 293(17): 2151 - 2154. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange In This Issue Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: