HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilkins, T. Articles by Gillies, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilkins, T. Articles by Gillies, R. A. Related Collections Prevention Quantitative methods Professional practice

Office-Based Unsedated Ultrathin Esophagoscopy in a Primary Care Setting

Department of Family Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Thad Wilkins, MD, Medical College of Georgia, HB-4031, Augusta, GA 30912, twilkins{at}mcg.edu

PURPOSE Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common and with time may be complicated by Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, including esophagoscopy, is the procedure of choice to diagnose Barrett’s esophagus and other esophageal disease. The use of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy (UUE) has been reported by gastroenterologists in specialized endoscopy units and otolaryngologists in outpatient otolaryngology offices, but UUE has not been previously described in a primary care setting. This study examines the feasibility of office-based UUE in primary care.

METHODS This study is a retrospective chart review in a university-based family medicine clinic in the southeastern United States. Charts were reviewed of 56 adult outpatients who were referred for further evaluation of reflux symptoms that persisted after at least 4 weeks of therapy with histamine₂ receptor agonists or proton pump inhibitors and who elected to undergo UUE in the primary care setting. Patient demographics, procedure indications and findings, changes in clinical management, and procedure times were recorded.

RESULTS One hundred percent of patients asked to participate in UUE were willing to undergo the procedure (mean age 48.3 ± 1.6 y, 57.1% women); 95% of the patients tolerated UUE. Barrett’s esophagus was diagnosed in 5.7% (n = 3) of the patients. Mean procedure time was 5.5 ± 1.7 min. No complications were reported in this series.

CONCLUSIONS Initial data suggest that UUE is feasible in primary care, with the majority of patients tolerating the procedure. UUE may be an efficient method of examining the distal esophagus.

Key Words: Endoscopy, gastrointestinal • family practice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange In This Issue Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 98 - 99. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: