Annals of Family Medicine Annals Impact Factor is 4.5
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 3:200-208 (2005)
© 2005 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.269

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schonlau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keeler, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schonlau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Keeler, E.

Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Collaborative in Asthma Care: Does it Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care?

Matthias Schonlau, PhD1, Rita Mangione-Smith, MD, MPH2, Kitty S. Chan, PhD1, Joan Keesey, BA1, Mayde Rosen, RN, BSN1, Thomas A. Louis, PhD3, Shin-Yi Wu, PhD1 and Emmett Keeler, PhD1

1 RAND Health, Santa Monica, Calif
2 Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif
3 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Matthias Schonlau, PhD, RAND, 201 N Craig St, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, matt{at}rand.org

PURPOSE We wanted to examine whether a collaborative to improve asthma care influences process and outcomes of care in asthmatic adults.

METHOD We undertook a preintervention-postintervention evaluation of 185 patients in 6 intervention clinics and 3 matched control sites that participated in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series (BTS) Collaborative for asthma care. The intervention consisted of 3, 2-day educational sessions for teams dispatched by participating sites, which were followed by 3 action periods during the course of a year.

RESULTS Overall process of asthma care improved significantly in the intervention compared with the control group (change of 10% vs 1%, P = .003). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to attend educational sessions (20% vs 5%, P = .03). Having a written action plan, setting goals, monitoring peak flow rates, and using long-term asthma medications increased between 2% and 19% (not significant), but asthma-related knowledge was unchanged for the 2 groups. Patients in the BTS Collaborative were significantly more likely to be satisfied with clinician and lay educator communication (62% vs 39%, P = .02). Health-related quality of life, asthma-specific quality of life, number of bed days caused by asthma-related illness, and acute care service use were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS The intervention was associated with improved process-of-care measures that have been linked with better outcomes. Patients benefited through increased satisfaction with communication. Follow-up of patients who participated in the intervention may have been too brief to be able to detect significant improvement in health-related outcomes.

Key Words: Asthma • evaluation studies • chronic disease • breakthrough series collaborative • chronic care model • process of care • outcomes and process assessment (health care)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
D. B. McWilliams, R. M. Jacobson, H. K. Van Houten, J. M. Naessens, and K. L. Ytterberg
A Program of Anticipatory Guidance for the Prevention of Emergency Department Visits for Ear Pain
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2008; 162(2): 151 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. B Wilson, B. E Landon, P. V Marsden, L. R Hirschhorn, K. McInnes, L. Ding, and P. D Cleary
Correlations among measures of quality in HIV care in the United States: cross sectional study
BMJ, November 24, 2007; 335(7629): 1085 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Minkman, K. Ahaus, and R. Huijsman
Performance improvement based on integrated quality management models: what evidence do we have? A systematic literature review
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 90 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. E. Landon, L. S. Hicks, A. J. O'Malley, T. A. Lieu, T. Keegan, B. J. McNeil, and E. Guadagnoli
Improving the Management of Chronic Disease at Community Health Centers
N. Engl. J. Med., March 1, 2007; 356(9): 921 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
L L Leape, G Rogers, D Hanna, P Griswold, F Federico, C A Fenn, D W Bates, L Kirle, and B R Clarridge
Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. C. Young, G. B. Glade, G. J. Stoddard, and C. Norlin
Evaluation of a Learning Collaborative to Improve the Delivery of Preventive Services by Pediatric Practices
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): 1469 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange and P. A. Nutting
In This Issue: Bursting the Bubble on Chronic Disease Management, the Meaning of Healing, PBRN Methods Supplement, and the Annals' 2-Year Anniversary
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 194 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
L. I. Solberg
If You've Seen One Quality Improvement Collaborative ...
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 198 - 199.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Annals of Family Medicine.