HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) TRACK Comments: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Weel, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Weel, C.

Longitudinal Research and Data Collection in Primary Care

Department of Family Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Chris van Weel, MD, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, 229-HAG, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands, C.vanWeel{at}hag.umcn.nl

PURPOSE This article reviews examples of and experience with longitudinal research in family medicine. The objective is to use this empirical information to formulate recommendations for improving longitudinal research.

METHODS The article discusses 3 longitudinal studies from the Nijmegen academic family practice research network: 1 on the prognosis of depression and 1 each on the prognosis of and outcomes of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Nijmegen network has recorded all episodes of morbidity encountered in Dutch family medicine since 1971 in a stable practice population. This network’s experience is evaluated to identify lessons that may help other practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in pursuing longitudinal research.

RESULTS In terms of external conditions (conditions related to the general setting), the stability of a population and a high level of continuity of care substantially enhance the ability to perform longitudinal research. In terms of internal conditions (conditions related to the PBRN), motivation of family physicians and their staff to conduct ongoing data collection, and their ownership of the data are key for success. Other critical internal conditions include standardization of data; collection of data by clinician-friendly means; training of family physicians and their staff in data collection, as well as meetings for discussion of this task; provision of feedback to practices on the research findings; use of standard procedures to promote adherence to data collection; availability of facilities for regular measurement of patients’ health status or chart review; and use of mechanisms for tracking patients who leave the practice area.

CONCLUSIONS Insight from existing experience suggests that longitudinal research can be enhanced in PBRNs. The best way forward is to build longitudinal data collection by drawing on lessons from successful studies. Primary care research policy should advocate for a role of longitudinal research and stimulate its development in PBRNs under favorable population circumstances.

Key Words: Longitudinal studies • PBRNs • primary health care • family practice • research design • databases • long-term care • historical cohort studies

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. van den Nieuwenhof, T. Schermer, Y. Heijdra, B. Bottema, R. Akkermans, H. Folgering, and C. van Weel Are asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness and allergy risk factors for asthma? A longitudinal study Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 70 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Lanier Primary Care Practice-Based Research Comes of Age in the United States Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(suppl_1): S2 - S4. [Full Text] [PDF]