HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Comments: Submit a response TRACK Comments: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mainous, A. G. Articles by Tilley, B. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mainous, A. G., III Articles by Tilley, B. C.

Development of a Measure to Assess Patient Trust in Medical Researchers

¹ Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
² Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
³ Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Arch G. Mainous III, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 295 Calhoun St., Charleston, SC 29425, mainouag{at}musc.edu

PURPOSE Many researchers find it difficult to recruit individuals, particularly minorities, for participation in studies. Mistrust of research and researchers may act as a barrier to participation. The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for assessing trust in medical researchers.

METHODS We developed a multi-item scale by means of multiple cognitive pretests with 25 African American adults and a random-digit-dialing telephone survey of 512 adults in South Carolina. Psychometric characteristics of the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale was assessed by factor analysis using both orthogonal and oblique rotations and Cronbach’s . We assessed construct validity as well as a behavioral intention for future participation in a medical research project.

RESULTS The results of the orthogonal and oblique rotations in the exploratory factor analysis were similar and suggested 2 distinct factors in the final 12 items included in the scale. Cronbach’s for the entire scale was 0.84, whereas it was 0.78 for the first factor of Participant Deception and 0.75 for the second factor of Researcher Honesty. White respondents (28.7 ± 5.6) had greater trust than African American respondents (24.1 ± 6.9) (P <.001). Individuals with high trust in medical researchers were more likely to express interest in future participation in medical research.

CONCLUSIONS The Trust in Medical Researchers Scale has good psychometric qualities and differentiates African American from white respondents, as well as individuals who indicate that they are likely to participate in medical research from those who are not. More focused investigations in hard-to-recruit populations will help to establish the utility of the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale.

Key Words: Trust • data collection • scale development

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange On TRACK: Medical Research Must Consider Context and Complexity Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2006; 4(4): 369 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. Stange and L. S. Acheson In This Issue: Communication in the Era of 'Personalized' Medicine Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 194 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: