Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 4:527-533 (2006)
© 2006 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.579

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Appendix
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karasz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karasz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, L.

Conceptual Models of Treatment in Depressed Hispanic Patients

Alison Karasz, PhD and Liza Watkins, MA

Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Alison Karasz, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 3544 Jerome Avenue, Bronx, NY 10467, akkarasz{at}montefiore.org

PURPOSE Though patient variables are likely to play an important role in the undertreatment of depression, little is known of patients’ perceptions of standard depression treatments. In an effort to understand their perspective, we investigated depressed Hispanic patients’ perceptions of primary care treatments and the specific benefits associated with them.

METHODS We undertook semistructured interviews with 121 depressed Hispanic medical patients waiting for their appointments. We developed and implemented a coding scheme using standard iterative procedures.

RESULTS More than one half of the patients viewed physician consultation and medication as helpful. Almost all patients considered psychotherapy to be helpful. Supportive talk was the most commonly mentioned specific benefit of physician consultation. The most common benefit of medication was its anxiolytic, sedative effect; energizing effects were less common. The most common benefits associated with psychotherapy included support, advice, and catharsis. Patients currently taking medication for depression had a more favorable view of pharmacological treatment; differences by language of interview were noted.

CONCLUSIONS Patients’ perceptions of the specific efficacies of depression treatment did not match priorities implicit in current treatment guidelines. Such perceptions may play a key role in shaping patients’ decisions to initiate and maintain treatment.

Key Words: Ethnic groups • mental health • depression • antidepressants • psychotherapy • physician-patient relations • conceptual models • primary care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange
In This Issue: Prescribing Drugs: What Do Patients and Pharmaceutical Companies Really Want?
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 482 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

Qualitative research provides the color in our guidelines
Patricia Adam
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Dec 2006 [Full text]
More talk, less action
Christopher F Dowrick
Annals of Family Medicine, 8 Dec 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Annals of Family Medicine.