HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Kottke, T. E. Articles by Woolf, S. H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kottke, T. E. Articles by Woolf, S. H.

Optimizing Practice Through Research: A New Perspective to Solve an Old Problem

¹ HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
² Department of Medicine (Emeritus), University of Washington, Seattle
³ Kaiser Permanente’s Care Management Institute, Oakland, California
⁴ Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco
⁵ Lovelace Clinic Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico
⁶ Kaiser Permanente Colorado Clinical Research Unit, Departments of Emergency Medicine, and Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver
⁷ Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology, and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Thomas E. Kottke, MD, MSPH, HealthPartners Research Foundation, 8170 33rd Ave S, PO Box 1524, MS 21111R, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, thomas.e.kottke{at}healthpartners.com

ABSTRACT

Policy makers, researchers, clinicians, and the public are frustrated that research in the health sciences has not resulted in a greater improvement in patient outcomes. Our experience as clinicians and researchers suggests that this frustration could be reduced if health sciences research were directed by 5 broad principles: (1) the needs of patients and populations determine the research agenda; (2) the research agenda addresses contextual and implementation issues, including the development of delivery and accountability systems; (3) the research agenda determines the research methods rather than methods determines the research agenda; (4) researchers and clinicians collaborate to define the research agenda, allocate resources, and implement findings; and (5) the level of funding for implementation research is commensurate with and proportional to the magnitude of the task. To keep the research agenda focused on the task of improving health and to acknowledge that the effort must be seen as more comprehensive than translating or transferring research into practice (TRIP), we suggest that the task be reframed, using the term optimizing practice through research.

Key Words: Research • translation • practice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange In this Issue: Access to Care, Spirituality, and Relevant Research Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2008; 6(5): 386 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF]