Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 6:S28-S32 (2008)
© 2008 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.739
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carek, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carek, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Quality improvement

Improving Anticoagulation Therapy Using Point-of-Care Testing and a Standardized Protocol

Curtis A. Franke, MD1, Lori M. Dickerson, PharmD2 and Peter J. Carek, MD, MS2

1 Baylor Family Medicine at Uptown, Health Texas Provider Network, Dallas, Texas
2 Trident/MUSC Family Medicine Residency Program, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Lori M. Dickerson, PharmD 9298 Medical Plaza Dr Charleston, SC 29406 macfarll{at}musc.edu

PURPOSE Many patients in primary care require anticoagulation with warfarin for the prevention of venous and systemic embolism. Achieving the goal international normalized ratio (INR) with warfarin is challenging. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to increase the proportion of patients taking warfarin with an INR value within the goal range.

METHODS We included all patients identified on an anticoagulation log in the family medicine residency practice during 3 time periods: baseline, after point-of-care (POC) testing was initiated (intervention period 1), and after a standardized warfarin-dosing protocol was implemented (intervention period 2). Educational sessions were conducted during each intervention period. Measures included the frequency of INR monitoring and the percentage of office visits in which patients’ values were within the goal INR range. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Student t test, and the {chi}2 test.

RESULTS At baseline, patients had an average of 2.6 INR tests performed, and 30.8% were within the INR goal range. Using POC testing, the frequency of monitoring increased to 4.3 INR tests per patient (P = .04), but the percentage of patients within the INR goal remained low at 32.1% (P=.88). When physicians implemented the standardized protocol to guide warfarin dosing, the frequency of testing was similar (3.8 tests per patient), but the percentage of patients within the INR goal increased to 45.9% (P<.04).

CONCLUSIONS POC testing increased the frequency of INR testing, and additional use of a standardized protocol for warfarin dosing increased the percentage of patients within the INR goal range. This model of anticoagulation management could be easily implemented in any family medicine office.

Key Words: Anticoagulation • warfarin • dosing • international normalized ratio • venous thromboembolism • point-of-care systems • bedside testing • protocol • primary care






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Annals of Family Medicine.