|
|
||||||||
1 University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Primary Care Research Institute, Fort Worth, Texas
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Roberto Cardarelli, DO, MPH, UNTHSC, Primary Care Research Institute, 855 Montgomery, 2nd Floor, Fort Worth, Texas 76107, rcardare{at}hsc.unt.edu
PURPOSE We wanted to assess the relationship between having a personal health care provider and receiving colorectal cancer testing.
METHODS Self-reported data were obtained from the United States 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Men and women aged 50 years and older were included, and associations of having a personal health care provider, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and health insurance status with colorectal cancer testing were examined. Multiple logistic regression was performed on a final sample of 120,221 individuals.
RESULTS Having at least 1 personal health care provider significantly predicted up-to-date colorectal cancer testing in both the univariate (odds ratio [OR]=3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.56–4.41) and multiple regression models (OR = 2.91; 95% CI 2.58–3.28). Age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and health insurance were also significantly associated with up-to-date colorectal cancer testing.
CONCLUSIONS Having a personal health care provider was associated with up-to-date colorectal cancer testing. Efforts to increase and support the primary care workforce are needed to improve up-to-date colorectal cancer screening rates.
Key Words: Health care delivery health services research primary health care access to health care health services accessibility colorectal cancer health promotion screening
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. C. Stange Implementation Insights Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2009; 7(2): 179 - 181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Stange The Complexity of and Opportunity for Screening in Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2009; 7(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Berg The Aftermath of Efficacy Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2009; 7(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |