|
|
||||||||
1 University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, Connecticut
2 Department of Drug Information at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Craig I. Coleman, PharmD, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102-5037, ccolema{at}harthosp.org
PURPOSE We wanted to determine the association between consumption of barley and changes in plasma lipids in healthy and hypercholesterolemic men and women.
METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted from the earliest possible date through January 2008. Trials were included in the analysis if they were randomized controlled trials of barley that reported efficacy data on at least 1 lipid endpoint. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used in calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was addressed using the I2 statistic. Visual inspection of funnel plots, Eggers weighted regression statistics, and the trim and fill method were used to assess for publication bias.
RESULTS We found 8 trials (n = 391 patients) of 4 to 12 weeks duration evaluating the lipid-reducing effects of barley. The use of barley significantly lowered total cholesterol (weighted mean difference [WMD], –13.38 mg/dL; 95% CI, –18.46 to –8.31 mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (WMD, –10.02 mg/dL; 95% CI, –14.03 to –6.00 mg/dL) and triglycerides (WMD, –11.83 mg/dL; 95% CI, –20.12 to –3.55 mg/dL) but did not appear to significantly alter high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P=.07).
CONCLUSION Barley-derived β-glucan appears to beneficially affect total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, but not HDL-cholesterol.
Key Words: Barley beta-glucans dietary fiber lipids meta-analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Gotler and K. C. Stange A Way Forward for Health Care and Healers Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2009; 7(3): 273 - 274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Phillips In This Issue: Practice, Research, and Reflection Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2009; 7(2): 98 - 99. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all TRACK Comments
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |