HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental data: Appendix 1-2 In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dros, J. Articles by van Weert, H. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dros, J. Articles by van Weert, H. C. Related Collections Chronic illness Quantitative methods

Accuracy of Monofilament Testing to Diagnose Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

¹ Department of Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
² Department of Family Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jacquelien Dros, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, j.dros{at}amc.uva.nl

PURPOSE We wanted to summarize evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of the 5.07/10-g monofilament test in peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies in which the accuracy of the 5.07/10-g monofilament was evaluated to detect peripheral neuropathy of any cause using nerve conduction as reference standard. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool.

RESULTS We reviewed 173 titles and abstracts of articles to identify 54 potentially eligible studies, of which 3 were finally selected for data synthesis. All studies were limited to patients with diabetes mellitus and showed limitations according to the QUADAS tool. Sensitivity ranged from 41% to 93% and specificity ranged from 68% to 100%. Because of the heterogenous nature of the studies, a meta-analysis could not be accomplished.

CONCLUSIONS Despite the frequent use of monofilament testing, little can be said about the test accuracy for detecting neuropathy in feet without visible ulcers. Optimal test application and defining a threshold should have priority in evaluating monofilament testing, as this test is advocated in many clinical guidelines. Accordingly, we do not recommend the sole use of monofilament testing to diagnose peripheral neuropathy.

Key Words: Peripheral neuropathy • peripheral nervous system diseases • monofilament testing • Semmes-Weinstein monofilament • review, systematic • primary health care • diabetic foot

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange Actionable Ideas to Improve Health Care and Health Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2010; 8(1): 82 - 84. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Acheson and J. J. Frey III In This Issue: Multifaceted Research Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2009; 7(6): 482 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: