HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) In Brief TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment TRACK Discussion: View Comments Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shokar, N. K. Articles by Weller, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shokar, N. K. Articles by Weller, S. C. Related Collections Prevention Quantitative methods Communication / decision making Patient perspectives

Informed Decision Making Changes Test Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Diverse Population

¹ Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
² Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Navkiran K. Shokar, MD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, 77555-1123, nkshokar{at}utmb.edu

PURPOSE We wanted to better understand patient preferences and decision making about options for colorectal cancer screening. Consistency in patient preferences could improve patient-clinician communication about tests by simplifying and focusing discussions.

METHODS In a cross-sectional sample of primary care patients, cognitive ranking tasks were used to estimate patient preferences for fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema before and after consideration of 13 test attributes, such as accuracy and scientific evidence. Patients also ranked the 13 test attributes and attribute descriptions in terms of importance. Friedman’s nonparametric test was used to measure overall discrimination among items, and the average Pearson correlation coefficient (&rmacr;) among participants was used to measure the degree of consistency in choices.

RESULTS Participants (n = 168) averaged 62.1 years of age, and 64.3% were of minority racial ethnicity. For test-specific attributes, preferences were for high test accuracy (=0.63, P <.001), amount of colon examined (=0.64, P <.001), strong scientific evidence for efficacy (=0.59, P<.001), minimum discomfort (=0.50, P <.001), and low risk of complications (=0.38, P<.001). When all 13 attributes were considered together, agreement dropped (=0.13, P<.001), but attributes considered most important for decision making were test accuracy, scientific evidence for efficacy, amount of colon examined, and need for sedation. Test preferences showed moderate agreement (=0.20, P <.001), and choices were fairly consistent before and after exposure to test-specific attributes (=0.17, P = .007). Initially the modal choice was fecal occult blood testing (59%); however, after exposure to test specific attributes, the modal choice was colonoscopy (54%).

CONCLUSION Participants were clear about the attributes that they prefer, but no single test has those attributes. Preferences were varied across participants and were not predictable; clinicians should discuss the full range of recommended tests for colorectal cancer with all patients.

Key Words: Colorectal neoplasms • mass screening • physician-patient communication • patient preference • decision making • ethnic groups

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. C. Stange Tip of the Iceberg Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2010; 8(3): 268 - 268. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Frey III In This Issue: Relationships Count for Patients and Doctors Alike Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2010; 8(2): 98 - 99. [Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments: