Annals of Family Medicine 2:569-575 (2004)
© 2004 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.244
Improving Test Ordering in Primary Care: The Added Value of a Small-Group Quality Improvement Strategy Compared With Classic Feedback Only
Wim H. J. M. Verstappen, MD, PhD1,2,
Trudy van der Weijden, MD, PhD1,
Willy I. Dubois, MSc1,
,
Ivo Smeele, MD, PhD2,
Jan Hermsen, MD3,
Frans E. S. Tan, PhD4 and
Richard P. T. M. Grol, PhD1
1 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), and Department of Primary Care, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
2 Centre for Diagnostics and Consultation, St Jans Hospital, Weert, The Netherlands
3 Centre for Diagnostics and Consultation, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
4 Medical Diagnostic Centre, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
5 Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Structure of the 90-minute small-group quality improvement meeting.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Flow of randomized trial. PCP = primary care physician.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Baseline and follow-up measurements in mean total numbers of tests per 6 months at aggregated local practice group level for the 13 intervention and the 14 feedback local practice groups.
|
|
Copyright © 2004 by the Annals of Family Medicine.