Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine 6:69-77 (2008)
© 2008 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.761

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow In Brief
Right arrow Journal Club
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swartz, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Swartz, A. M.

A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss

Caroline R. Richardson, MD1,2, Tiffany L. Newton, BS1, Jobby J. Abraham, MBBS1, Ananda Sen, PhD3, Masahito Jimbo, MD, PhD, MPH1 and Ann M. Swartz, PhD4

1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
2 Health Services Research and Development Center, Ann Arbor Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3 Center for Statistical Consultation and Research (CSCAR) and Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
4 Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, College of Health Sciences, Milwaukee


Figure 1
View larger version (2K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1.
 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Funnel plot test to test for publication bias. No evidence of publication bias was found.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Forest plot of effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for all 9 cohorts, based on the random effects meta-analysis results.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Weight change by study intervention duration.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Annals of Family Medicine.