Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Annals of Family Medicine 3:197- (2005)
© 2005 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
doi: 10.1370/afm.330
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Special Article
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.

Editorial

New Knowledge for and About Primary Care: A View Through the Looking Glass of the Annals of Family Medicine

William L. Miller, MD, MA, William R. Phillips, MD, MPH, Louise S. Acheson, MD, MS, Benjamin F. Crabtree, PhD, Stephen J. Zyzanski, PhD, Paul A. Nutting, MD, MSPH, Robin S. Gotler, MA, Laura A. McLellan, MLS and Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD

The Annals of Family Medicine began publication 2 years ago to provide a forum for new kinds of knowledge, new ways of generating knowledge, and new ways of sharing information across the traditional boundaries of profession, role or geography.1 In a special article, which can be found online as a supplemental article at http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/content/full/3/3/197/DC1, the editors analyze the content of the first 2 volumes. We recognize the small slice of the primary care research pie that is represented by the Annals. Nevertheless, this analysis attempts to identify how diverse authors and readers have used this forum to transmit and interact with new knowledge about health and primary care. From this analysis, we attempt to draw some larger lessons about the current state and future directions for primary care research.

The following text is the abstract to the supplemental special article:

PURPOSE

At this second anniversary of the Annals of Family Medicine, we sought to characterize primary care research and to identify opportunities for new directions by analyzing the content of the first and second volumes of the Annals.

METHODS

Using an a priori classification scheme, 2 editors independently categorized each research article and essay published in 2003 and 2004, excluding supplements. We categorized the domain of knowledge, methods, topical content, whether articles represented core values of primary care, and looked for articles that studied health/illness/symptoms from a uniquely primary care experience. We reconciled differences by discussion.

RESULTS

Among 110 articles, knowledge domains reflected the 4 quadrants of the clinician (n = 6), patient, family, or community (10), health care system (32), disease (22), or the interface (39) between these quadrants. The most frequent methods were cross-sectional studies (23), cohorts (15), randomized clinical trials (13), qualitative interviews (11), analyses of secondary data (11), systematic reviews (11), methods/theory development (10), self-reflections (8), and mixed methods (5). The most common topical areas were chronic disease and prevention. Core primary care values were represented in 75% of articles. Only 2 articles represented an integrative illness/healing perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite contemporary forces driving a reductionistic approach, primary care research, as reflected by articles published in the Annals of Family Medicine, addresses the domains of knowledge that contribute to comprehensive, relationship-centered health care. More work is needed to understand the nature of health and illness in whole people and ways to integrate diverse knowledge, methods and fragmented health care.

REFERENCE

  1. Stange KC, Phillips WR, Acheson LS, et al. Welcome to the Annals of Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:2–4.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
I. R. McWhinney
Assessing Clinical Discoveries
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 3 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann Fam MedHome page
K. C. Stange and P. A. Nutting
In This Issue: Bursting the Bubble on Chronic Disease Management, the Meaning of Healing, PBRN Methods Supplement, and the Annals' 2-Year Anniversary
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 194 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]

TRACK Comments:

Read all TRACK Comments

The real value of reflection
Jessie C. Gruman
Annals of Family Medicine, 6 Jun 2005 [Full text]
The Future of Quality Improvement Collaborations
David W. Moskowitz MD FACP
Annals of Family Medicine, 21 Jul 2005 [Full text]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental data: Special Article
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: Submit a Comment
Right arrow TRACK Discussion: View Comments
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when TRACK Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stange, K. C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS