|
|
||||||||
1 Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH
2 Plymouth Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic, Plymouth, NH
3 Exeter Pediatric Associates, Exteter, NH
4 Bedford Pediatrics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic, Bedford, NH
5 Abenaki Family Physicians, Wolfeboro Falls, NH
6 Evergreen Family Health, Williston, Vt
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Ardis L. Olson, MD, Clinicians Enhancing Child Health Network, Dartmouth Medical School, 7925 Rubin Bldg, One Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756, ardis.olson{at}dartmouth.edu
Key Words: Primary health care adolescents health behavior practice-based research network behavioral/psychosocial teenagers computers, handheld
| PURPOSE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Given the competing demands of primary care, only a very limited portion of the doctor-patient interaction is devoted to addressing these health risk behaviors.1 The visit is instead structured around gathering a health history and performing the physical examination. To assist adolescents in making healthy decisions, the emphasis of clinical encounters needs to be shifted from data-gathering to helping patients adopt and maintain healthy behaviors.
The purpose of our study was to create tools to improve health risk screening, counseling, and support for targeted behavior change among adolescents in primary care practices. We set out to create a package of tools that would facilitate integration of effective adolescent health behavior counseling into primary care practices. We aimed to create tools that would be easy to implement, inexpensive, and effective, and would be sustainable for use in practice.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The physician innovators, with the support of the research team, used their own practices as laboratories to test the PDA screener and action plan forms. A beta version of each tool was developed by the research team. The group conferred monthly, revising tools in response to experiences in the practices. The research team provided technological support for data collection and assisted with incorporating the tools into current office systems. A 2-hour program on motivational interviewing and goal setting provided training to the innovators on patient-centered counseling and developing action plans. An e-mail follow-up protocol was developed whereby medical students would contact the teens and provide support for their planned actions over 4 weeks.
This report covers the key lessons learned about these new clinical tools from informal interactions and a survey of clinicians (n = 15) in the 6 practices who used the PDA screener and the action plan materials. We analyzed exit questionnaires given to adolescents before (n = 67) and after (n = 98) implementation of the new tools to assess their perceptions of the quality of the visit and the topics discussed. Adolescents views of the PDA screening and desired follow-up are based on these exit questionnaires.
| LESSONS LEARNED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PDA screening was well received by teens and clinicians. The PDA screeners offered a novelty that engaged adolescents. Teens preferred the PDA to paper screeners or "being grilled by the clinician." The small screen size and the feature that answers disappeared from view meant teens could privately complete the PDA screener while sitting next to a parent in the examination or waiting room. Teens were candid and willing to share personal information via the PDA, and the PDA opened up conversation with adolescents about important issues not otherwise revealed. In a postvisit survey of 98 adolescents, 73% said the screener made it easier to discuss issues with their health care professional. Clinicians feedback overall was very favorable, and all the clinicians have continued to use the PDA screeners in their routine care
Technology allowed centralized data collection in this study. Information delimited by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was collected from the PDAs. Data were sent from each practice via the Internet to a CECH central computer daily. We ultimately succeeded in establishing this data synchronization of PDAs in 5 of our 6 practices. This system can be used for ongoing data collection for other projects. For the sixth practice, we exchanged PDAs via mail. We had the challenge of negotiating with information technology consultants at multiple small practices. Despite the emerging electronic medical record and use of the Internet, we found community practices lacked on-site expertise and often had older equipment not compatible with our software. Once established, however, synchronization of the PDA was simple enough to allow primary care office and nursing staff to routinely transmit data to the central office.
Our experience suggests that committing to a postvisit action plan is challenging for teens. Most adolescents were not prepared to think of "problems" and changing health risk behaviors during routine checkups, in contrast to visits for an identified chronic condition or specific complaint. Clinicians discussed health risks from the screener as well as the concerns raised by the teens. Our clinicians found it difficult, however, to develop specific planned action steps with teens, especially younger teens. When a teen identified a specific concern, clinicians were more able to problem-solve and develop a plan. The action plans were the entry into e-mail counseling support, and thus this tool was offered to few teens. Whereas only 6% to 7% of teens were interested in e-mail for follow-up information, 28% were interested in receiving additional information after the visit. The lack of interest in e-mail contact from the office, even before being offered as follow-up to action plans, makes this option of postvisit support less likely to work for many teens. Selective use of action plans for teens once they are interested in making a change may be better received. The discussion of specific strengths and health risks was well received by adolescents and may be built on by providing all adolescents with specific written information about their strengths and health risks with targeted take-home materials.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Funding support: This project was supported by Prescription for Health, a national program of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation with support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Received for publication December 20, 2004. Revision received February 22, 2005. Accepted for publication March 16, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Meriwether, F. Lobelo, and R. R. Pate Themed Review: Clinical Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Youth American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 7 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |