Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Annals of Family Medicine :- ()
© Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Patient-Choice Vaginal Delivery?
Ann Fam Med Leeman and Plante 4: 265

The Article in Brief

Patient Choice Vaginal Delivery?

Lawrence M. Leeman, MD, MPH, and colleague

This essay argues that, with cesarean delivery rates consistently on the rise (from 4.5 percent in 1965 to 26.1 percent in 2002), a woman's option to choose vaginal childbirth should be preserved, specifically after a previous cesarean delivery or with a breech presentation. The authors question why cesarean delivery is framed as a woman's choice, whereas vaginal delivery often is not. The choice of a cesarean delivery can effect a woman's reproductive future, with a higher risk of certain pregnancy complications. The authors suggest that before a universal right of women to choose elective primary cesarean delivery is adopted, studies should be conducted to compare the risks of cesarean and vaginal delivery. They conclude that, if the issue is one of patient choice, then the choice of vaginal birth must be accepted and available.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow TRACK Comments: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow reprints & permissions


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS