Annals of Family Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRACK to:

Cross-Project Analyses:
Thomas Bodenheimer, Denise M. Young, Kate MacGregor, and Jodi Summers Holtrop
Practice-Based Research in Primary Care: Facilitator of, or Barrier to, Practice Improvement?
Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: S28-32S [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*TRACK: Submit a comment to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read Comment] Scientific Skepticism and Resistance to Change
Joseph E. Scherger   (3 August 2005)

Scientific Skepticism and Resistance to Change 3 August 2005
  Top
Joseph E. Scherger,
San Diego, CA. USA
University of California, San Diego

Send response to journal:
Re: Scientific Skepticism and Resistance to Change

Hooray for this article. Tom Bodenheimer and his co-authors take on the issue of how primary care research may impede rather than promote important practice change. During my morning run today where I often blow off frustrations, I thought of the notion that the Annals of Family Medicine might be like a Tory publication in the early days of an American revolution. Some of the necessary process changes we need to make are clear: electronic health records, clinical decision support and web based continuous communication. Each, when studied today, may look very problemmatic in today's applications. While we need to stay on track with good science, what we need most for the new model of family medicine and practice redesign is clear vision, belief in better model, and courage to change.

Competing interests:   None declared


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Annals of Family Medicine.