Quick Assessment of Literacy in Primary Care: The Newest Vital Sign

  1. Frank A. Hale, PhD1
  1. 1University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tucson, Ariz
  2. 2College of Nursing, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  1. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Barry D. Weiss, MD, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1450 North Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85719, bdweiss{at}u.arizona.edu
  1. A version of this report was presented at Medical Futures Forum, New York, NY. March 24, 2005.

  1. Figure 1A.
    View larger version:
      Figure 1A.

      The newest vital sign — English.

      Note; This single scenario is the final English version of the newest vital sign. The type size should be 14-point (as shown above) or larger. Patients are presented with the above scenario and asked the questions shown in Figure 1b.

    • Figure 1B.
      View larger version:
        Figure 1B.

        Questions and answers score sheet for the newest vital sign — English.

      • Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.
        View larger version:
          Figure 2.

          Distribution of scores on the Newest Vital Signs (NVS) and the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA).

          Note: Histograms on top show the distribution of participants’ scores on (A) the English version of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS-E) and (B) the English version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA-E). Histograms on the bottom show the distribution of scores on (C) the Spanish version of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS-S) and (D) the Spanish version of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA-S).

        TRACK Comments:

        | Table of Contents