Understanding the Context of Health for Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Moving From What Is the Matter to What Matters

Abstract
PURPOSE An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC).
METHODS Forty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research.
RESULTS Key contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community.
CONCLUSION Consistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.
- Received for publication August 6, 2013.
- Revision received December 24, 2013.
- Accepted for publication January 30, 2014.
- © 2014 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Building on the past: how historical research can contribute to our understanding of the spaces of general practice
- Managing Multiple Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 Among Patients with Social Health Risks
- Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
- Magnitude, pattern and correlates of multimorbidity among patients attending chronic outpatient medical care in Bahir Dar, northwest Ethiopia: the application of latent class analysis model
- Changing Reasons for Visiting Primary Care Over a 35-Year Period
- Guideline deviation and its association with specific chronic diseases among patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional cohort study in a care management setting
- Cancer Survivorship Care Roles for Primary Care Physicians
- Multimorbidity of chronic non-communicable diseases and its models of care in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol
- Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: the protocol for an evidence map
- Experiences of community-dwelling older adults living with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study
- Multimorbidity in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease
- Managing Complexity in Older Patients with CKD
- Comparison of count-based multimorbidity measures in predicting emergency admission and functional decline in older community-dwelling adults: a prospective cohort study
- Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
- A Participatory Model of the Paradox of Primary Care
- The relationship of individual comorbid chronic conditions to diabetes care quality
- Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey
- What to give the patient who has everything? A qualitative study of prescribing for multimorbidity in primary care
- AHA/ACC/HHS Strategies to Enhance Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Comorbid Conditions: From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- AHA/ACC/HHS Strategies to Enhance Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Comorbid Conditions: From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and US Department of Health and Human Services
- On-the-Ground Wisdom About Care Integration
- In This Issue: Many Arrows Rather than Magic Bullets
- IOM and DHHS Meeting on Making Clinical Practice Guidelines Appropriate for Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions