Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
DiscussionSpecial Report

The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research

Susan Sheridan, Suzanne Schrandt, Laura Forsythe; Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement (2013 inaugural panel), Tandrea S. Hilliard and Kathryn A. Paez
The Annals of Family Medicine March 2017, 15 (2) 165-170; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2042
Susan Sheridan
1Patient Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne Schrandt
1Patient Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC
2Patient Engagement, Arthritis Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Forsythe
3Evaluation & Analysis, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lforsythe@PCORI.org
Tandrea S. Hilliard
4American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn A. Paez
4American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE Engaging patients, caregivers, and other health care stakeholders as partners in planning, conducting, and disseminating research is a promising way to improve clinical decision making and outcomes. Many researchers, patients, and other stakeholders, however, lack clarity about when and how to engage as partners within the clinical research process. To address the need for guidance on creating meaningful stakeholder partnerships in patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) developed the PCORI Engagement Rubric (Rubric).

METHODS PCORI developed the Rubric drawing from a synthesis of the literature, a qualitative study with patients, a targeted review of engagement plans from PCORI-funded project applications, and a moderated discussion and review with PCORI’s Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement.

RESULTS The Rubric provides a framework for operationalizing engagement to incorporate patients and other stakeholders in all phases of research. It includes: principles of engagement; definitions of stakeholder types; key considerations for planning, conducting, and disseminating engaged research; potential engagement activities; and examples of promising practices from PCORI-funded projects.

CONCLUSIONS PCORI designed the Rubric to illustrate opportunities for engagement to researchers interested in applying for PCORI funding and to patients and other stakeholders interested in greater involvement in research. By encouraging PCORI applicants, awardees, and others to apply the rubric, PCORI hopes to shift the research paradigm from one of conducting research on patients as subjects to a pursuit carried out in collaboration with patients and other stakeholders to better reflect the values, preferences, and outcomes that matter to the patient community.

  • patient-centered
  • patient outcomes
  • patient engagement
  • Received for publication September 8, 2016.
  • Revision received December 9, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication December 28, 2016.
  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (2)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 15, Issue 2
March/April 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research
Susan Sheridan, Suzanne Schrandt, Laura Forsythe, Tandrea S. Hilliard, Kathryn A. Paez
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 165-170; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research
Susan Sheridan, Suzanne Schrandt, Laura Forsythe, Tandrea S. Hilliard, Kathryn A. Paez
The Annals of Family Medicine Mar 2017, 15 (2) 165-170; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2042
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • APPROACH TO DEVELOPING THE RUBRIC PCORI’s
    • THE PCORI ENGAGEMENT RUBRIC
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Caregiver Partnerships in Palliative Care Research Design and Implementation
  • Nursing home quality: what matters to patients
  • Taking an integrated knowledge translation approach in research to develop the CONSORT-Equity 2017 reporting guideline: an observational study
  • Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative
  • Evaluating patient and public involvement in research
  • Partnering With Parents to Create a Research Advisory Board in a Pediatric Research Network
  • Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
  • In This Issue: On-the-Ground Advances & High-Level Influences
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating General Practice Into the Australian COVID-19 Response: A Description of the General Practitioner Respiratory Clinic Program in Australia
  • Silent Consequences of COVID-19: Why It’s Critical to Recover Routine Vaccination Rates Through Equitable Vaccine Policies and Practices
  • Shared Language for Shared Work in Population Health
Show more Special Report

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Person groups:
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
    • Participatory / action research
  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Translational research
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Personalized care
  • Other topics:
    • Research capacity building
    • Patient perspectives
    • Communication / decision making
    • Disparities in health and health care

Keywords

  • patient-centered
  • patient outcomes
  • patient engagement

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2022 Annals of Family Medicine