Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
DiscussionReflections

The Chief Primary Care Medical Officer: Restoring Continuity

Noemi Doohan and Jennifer DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine July 2017, 15 (4) 366-371; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2078
Noemi Doohan
1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: noemi.doohan@ah.org
Jennifer DeVoe
2Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The year 2016 marked the 20th anniversary of the hospitalist profession, with more than 50,000 physicians identifying as hospitalists. The Achilles heel of hospitalist medicine, however, is discontinuity. Despite many current payment and delivery systems rewarding this discontinuity and severing long-term relationships between patient and primary care teams at the hospital door, primary care does not stop being important when a person is admitted to the hospital. The notion of a broken primary care continuum is not an academic construct, it causes real harm to patients. As a step toward fixing the discontinuity in our health care systems, we propose that every hospital needs a Chief Primary Care Medical Officer (CPCMO), an expert in practice across the spectrum of care. The CPCMO can lead hospital efforts to create systems that ensure primary care’s continuum is complete, while strengthening physician collaboration across specialties, and moving toward achieving the Quadruple Aim of enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing costs, and improving the work life of health care providers. For hospitals operating on value-based payment structures, anticipated improvement in measurable outcomes such as decreased length of stay, decreased readmission rates, improved transitions of care, improved patient satisfaction, improved access to primary care, and improved patient health, will enhance the rate of return on the hospital’s investment. The speciality of family medicine should reevaluate our purpose, and reembrace our mission as personal physicians by championing the creation of Chief Primary Care Medical Officers.

  • primary health care
  • continuity of patient care
  • hospital administration

More than 50,000 physicians identified as hospitalists in 2016,1 the 20th anniversary of the hospitalist profession.2 Hospital medicine is currently the largest and fastest growing internal medicine subspecialty with an associated decline in general internists.3 Despite unprecedented growth and keen interest in the hospitalist model among new physicians, it has challenged continuity and led to disrupted primary care.4–13 As recently described by Wachter and Goldman, the hospitalist model is “based on the premise that the benefits of inpatient specialization and full-time hospital presence outweigh the disadvantages of a purposeful discontinuity of care. Although hospitalists have been leaders in developing systems (eg, handoff protocols, post-discharge phone calls to patients) to mitigate harm from discontinuity, it remains the model’s Achilles’ heel.”2(p1010)

The discontinuity confounds efforts to create value-based systems that are accountable for population health.14 Primary care’s core tenets of comprehensiveness and continuity are critical contributors to patient and population health, yet the connection between patient and primary care physician is increasingly severed at the hospital door.15 Hospitals must actively seek new creative solutions to address this broken primary care continuum, in order to lead health care systems to produce measurable improvements in value (eg, toward the Quadruple Aim of enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing costs, and improving the work life of health care providers).16 We propose a solution—the Chief Primary Care Medical Officer (CPCMO).

NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PATIENTS

For many patients and physicians, the brokenness of the primary care continuum is painfully familiar. Discontinuity impacted the woman whose primary care physician (PCP) recently retired. After a lengthy hospitalization for a hip fracture, her discharge to a skilled nursing facility was overly complicated and prolonged because she had no PCP to accept her discharge. For the uninsured man with hypoxia who presented to the emergency department, the lack of a PCP allowed no endorsable pathway except hospital admission. Learning that his CT scan findings suggested end-stage metastatic lung cancer, he said “If I have incurable cancer, I want to go home to die.” But without a PCP to facilitate his discharge home with hospice, he was admitted and died in the hospital.

Current payment and delivery systems make it nearly impossible for PCPs to coordinate care transitions and support the inpatient team.9,17 For the child hospitalized with a serious traumatic brain injury, a stronger connection between the hospitalists and his PCP could have helped create a smooth discharge plan. His hospitalist team held daily family meetings, but during times the PCP was not able to participate. The discharge plan was unrealistic and led to a readmission within days. The complex social and medical needs of high-need, high-cost patients are exemplified by a homeless, alcoholic woman with schizophrenia and uncontrolled congestive heart failure who had 8 emergency department visits in the last month.18 After multiple handoffs to different hospitalist teams, critical details about the patient were lost, including information about her recent numerous CT scans at an outside hospital. The trusting and effective relationship with her PCP who would have helped coordinate her care—if he had been contacted—was absent, along with an opportunity to break the cycle of “super utilization.”

These fictionalized examples represent missed opportunities for patient-centered care, reduced cost, and better health outcomes. Some might argue they are extreme examples and not typical, but many patients are hospitalized daily without satisfactory communication with the PCP,19 and many hospitalizations do not actively engage the PCP.20 Patients are discharged and told to follow-up with their PCP by hospital systems that often have little knowledge of the PCP’s practice (eg, what is the PCP’s information system? Is the PCP equipped to manage complex discharge plans? What professionals are on the PCP’s team?). This discontinuity between hospital and clinic leads to unnecessary hospital readmissions, often without reimbursement for the readmission, and to prolonged stays.21

Fee-for-service payment systems reward hospitalist models and discontinuity of care, but primary care does not stop being important when an individual is admitted to the hospital.4,13,22 Primary care does not consist only of services provided in outpatient clinical settings. Primary care encompasses an enduring, continuous, and lifelong devotion to health that belongs everywhere care is delivered.23,24 Traditionally, the primary care function was envisioned as a PCP caring for a panel of patients in outpatient and inpatient settings.25,26 This model has become less common in the 21st century; however, the continuity, coordination, and comprehensiveness primary care provides to patients remains of high value.27–29 Innovation is needed to make the primary care circle whole again.30

A CREATIVE SOLUTION: THE CHIEF PRIMARY CARE MEDICAL OFFICER

As illustrated in the above stories, the notion of a broken primary care continuum is not an academic construct, it causes real harm to patients.31 We propose a new bridging leadership role—the Chief Primary Care Medical Officer (CPCMO)—as a creative solution built upon revisiting and strengthening the original intent of primary care. Every hospital should elect a CPCMO,32 an expert in clinical practice across the spectrum of care, a primary care physician who will lead hospital efforts to create systems that ensure primary care’s continuum is complete even for the most complex patients.

The principles of primary care championed by Dr Barbara Starfield29 serve as a useful guide to outline specific duties of the CPCMO (Table 1). Specific examples of how a CPCMO (and CPCMO-led teams) would benefit patients are readily described in Table 2. In broad terms, the CPCMO will be tasked with building systems that facilitate needed bidirectional flow of information and care between inpatient and outpatient settings, and creating maps of community resources and PCPs.6 These systems should be tailored to the individual needs and resources of the community. For example, based on existing resources, some communities will need hospitalists to be included on the team in the patient-centered medical home; others will need primary care physicians who lead teams in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Through this important bridging role, the CPCMO can also help address the social determinants of health and address barriers to primary care. Analogous to how a PCP develops continuous relationships with patients, the CPCMO will build longitudinal continuity with community PCPs, traveling to meet with community partners in order to better understand and advocate for their practices. Metrics such as the neighborhood stress score (NSS7) can be monitored by the CPCMO to determine if additional resources are needed to support partnering PCPs and as a means to better identify patients with high levels of neighborhood stress and other social determinants of health.33

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Chief Primary Care Medical Officer Functions and Roles

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Chief Primary Care Medical Officer Patient-Specific Scenarios

The ideal CPCMO would be a primary care clinician with 0.25 FTE time spent in continuity clinic; 0.25 FTE doing clinical work in the hospital (for example on hospitalist services or family medicine inpatient services) with participation on daily hospital case management rounds; and 0.50 FTE administrative in hospital leadership with membership and voting rights on key hospital committees such as the Medical Executive Committee and with the hospital medical staff leadership. Ongoing maintenance of skills in hospital and continuity clinical medicine is needed by the CPCMO in order to stay current in these changing practice environments.

The CPCMO role described here addresses one aspect of the complex large-scale solutions needed to fix our current fractured model of health care,34–37 and it is only an outline; the details for how the CPCMO function can be most effective will require scientific investigation—well designed and adequately resourced studies—to discover how best to implement this innovation. Important questions to be answered in these studies and through thoughtful planning with stakeholders will include what qualifications the role would require, how the CPCMO would integrate community PCPs into the inpatient system and hospitalists into the patient-centered medical home,38 how budgetary authority and resources would be allocated, how the CPCMO would fit into the traditional hospital administrative hierarchy, and how the CPCMO would accountably connect to the outpatient community. We predict these improvements will lead to substantial cost savings, which can sustainably fund creative solutions, such as the CPCMO. The CPCMO will be a wise investment for hospitals operating on value-based payment structures with an anticipated significant rate of return in important measurable outcomes, such as decreased length of stay and readmission rates; improved transitions of care, patient satisfaction, access to primary care, and patient health; and optimization of the primary care function.

AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN THE SHIFT TO VALUE-BASED CARE

The volume-based, fee-for-service paradigm that has characterized the US health care system for decades is unsustainable. Costs have continued to skyrocket without proportional improvements in population health. The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which received strong bipartisan support, will drive significant change through a greater emphasis on value-based care.39 As MACRA is implemented, it will require a transformed health care environment (eg, reimbursement shifts from volume to value, movement toward team-based care, increased accountability for population health). Hospitals have already begun to see changes in reimbursement, including reduced payment for hospital-acquired conditions and preventable readmissions. The historic changes to the US health care system represented by MACRA provide an urgent imperative for the implementation of creative solutions such as the CPCMO role.

Savings that arise from improved value can fund the CPCMO role. Additionally, a portion of the hospital-subsidized hospitalist funds could be shifted toward the CPCMO role and to support the needs that the CPCMO identifies for sustaining robust primary care systems. For health systems that want to institute a stepwise implementation of the CPCMO role, a focus on high-need, high-cost populations could initially be considered using established best practices regarding these complex populations.40 Regarding the cost of high-need, high-cost patients, 20% of all health care spending is accounted for by the top 1% of this population, and nearly 50% of spending is accounted for by the top 5%.41,42 Addressing the primary care root causes of this imbalance could drive initial funding for implementation of the CPCMO. The ample money in the US health care system can be redirected to improve value for these high utilizers of acute care services and for everyone else.

LET’S MAKE PRIMARY CARE WHOLE AGAIN

As new solutions are being created and tested during this era of health care transformation, it is important to refocus our lens on the traditional. Primary care, as originally envisioned (and practiced), is a great solution. One way to elevate primary care and unite the “new” and “old” worlds of medicine is through the CPCMO. The CPCMO will help make primary care whole again and rekindle the flame of traditional, personal doctoring.43–47 This requires a health care system that values and supports a trusting primary care relationship at critical junctures in life (ie, an admission to the hospital) and throughout “times of transition and instability; circumstances involving ambiguity and variability; situations where relationships and individualization matter; systems with a high degree of inter-connectedness or complexity; settings in which both strongly and loosely related events unfold with time; and situations where the whole is more than the sum of the parts.”48(p200)

Family physicians’ hospitalist knowledge, coupled with continued expertise and leadership in the outpatient setting, uniquely positions our profession to bridge the divide between the inpatient and outpatient worlds. Family physicians can fill the expert-generalist role that is increasingly needed in our evolving health care system.49 The comprehensiveness of family medicine contains health care costs and leads to fewer hospitalizations.50

CONCLUSION

This is a call for family medicine as a discipline to reevaluate our purpose, and reembrace our mission, by championing innovations such as the CPCMO which are inspired by the traditional primary care values of personal doctoring. As family physicians, we can (and must) reclaim our personal physician role in our patients’ lives and communities and advocate for system changes that support better health.45 This does not require doing all things for all people 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, but it does mean building a system of care that enables us to be the connection, the enduring presence, for our patients and communities in sickness and in health.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge formatting assistance from Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman of Oregon Health & Science University Department of Family Medicine.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

  • Received for publication October 20, 2016.
  • Revision received January 17, 2017.
  • Accepted for publication February 8, 2017.
  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wachter RM,
    2. Goldman L
    . Zero to 50,000 - The 20th anniversary of the hospitalist. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1009–1011.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Wachter RM,
    2. Goldman L
    . The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American health care system. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(7):514–517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. West CP,
    2. Dupras DM
    . General medicine vs subspecialty career plans among internal medicine residents. JAMA. 2012;308(21):2241–2247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. DeVoe J
    . When knowing more about a patient enables us to do less. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(10):1605–1606.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Adams DR,
    2. Flores A,
    3. Coltri A,
    4. Meltzer DO,
    5. Arora VM
    . A missed opportunity to improve patient satisfaction? Patient perceptions of inpatient communication with their primary care physician. Am J Med Qual. 2016;31(6):568–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Herzig SJ,
    2. Schnipper JL,
    3. Doctoroff L,
    4. et al
    . Physician perspectives on factors contributing to readmissions and potential prevention strategies: A multicenter survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(11):1287–1293.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ivins D,
    2. Blackburn B,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Newton WP,
    5. Puffer JC
    . A majority of family physicians use a hospitalist service when their patients require inpatient care. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015;6(2):70–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Luu NP,
    2. Pitts S,
    3. Petty B,
    4. et al
    . Provider-to-provider communication during transitions of care from outpatient to acute care: A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(4):417–425.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. McMillan A,
    2. Trompeter J,
    3. Havrda D,
    4. Fox J
    . Continuity of care between family practice physicians and hospitalist services. J Healthc Qual. 2013;35(1):41–49.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pham HH,
    2. Grossman JM,
    3. Cohen G,
    4. Bodenheimer T
    . Hospitalists and care transitions: the divorce of inpatient and outpatient care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(5):1315–1327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sharma G,
    2. Fletcher KE,
    3. Zhang D,
    4. Kuo YF,
    5. Freeman JL,
    6. Goodwin JS
    . Continuity of outpatient and inpatient care by primary care physicians for hospitalized older adults. JAMA. 2009;301(16):1671–1680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Turner J,
    2. Hansen L,
    3. Hinami K,
    4. et al
    . The impact of hospitalist discontinuity on hospital cost, readmissions, and patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):1004–1008.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Beckman H
    . Three degrees of separation. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151 (12):890–891.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Obama B
    . United States health care reform: Progress to date and next steps. JAMA. 2016;316(5):525–532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Mitchum R
    . Building a new Marcus Welby to cut costs. Science Life: A Blog of News and Ideas in Biomedicine; University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences. https://sciencelife.uchospitals.edu/2012/07/11/building-a-new-marcus-welby-to-cut-costs/. Published Jul 11, 2012.
  10. ↵
    1. Bodenheimer T,
    2. Sinsky C
    . From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6): 573–576.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Nelson L
    . Lessons from Medicare’s Demonstration Projects on Disease Management, Care Coordination, and Value-Based Payment. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office Working Paper 2012–02;2012.
  12. ↵
    1. Peterson K,
    2. Helfand M,
    3. Humphrey L,
    4. Christensen V,
    5. Carson S
    . Evidence Brief: Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Programs; VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs. Washington, DC: 2011.
  13. ↵
    1. Sheu L,
    2. Fung K,
    3. Mourad M,
    4. Ranji S,
    5. Wu E
    . We need to talk: Primary care provider communication at discharge in the era of a shared electronic medical record. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(5):307–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kripalani S,
    2. Jackson AT,
    3. Schnipper JL,
    4. Coleman EA
    . Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007;2(5):314–323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Wasson JH,
    2. Sauvigne AE,
    3. Mogielnicki RP,
    4. et al
    . Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252(17):2413–2417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. DeVoe JE
    . Dad’s last week. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(3):273–276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. deGruy FV III.,
    2. Green LA
    . Return-for good this time-to practicing in the context of families and communities. Ann Fam Med. 2016; 14(5):402–403.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Scheffler R,
    2. Bodenheimer T,
    3. Lombardo P,
    4. et al
    . The future of primary care—the community responds. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(25): 2636–2639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    American Board of Family Medicine. History of the specialty. https://www.theabfm.org/about/history.aspx. Accessed Oct 18, 2016.
  20. ↵
    1. Glazner C
    . Dinosaurs, hospital ecosystems, and the future of family medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(4):368–369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Mainous AG III.,
    2. Goodwin MA,
    3. Stange KC
    . Patient-physician shared experiences and value patients place on continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):452–454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Scott JG,
    2. Cohen D,
    3. Dicicco-Bloom B,
    4. Miller WL,
    5. Stange KC,
    6. Crabtree BF
    . Understanding healing relationships in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(4):315–322.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    . Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. O’Malley AS,
    2. Rich EC
    . Measuring comprehensiveness of primary care: Challenges and opportunities. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(Suppl 3):S568–S575.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Gunderman R
    . Hospitalists and the decline of comprehensive care. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1011–1013.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Doohan NC,
    2. Duane M,
    3. Harrison B,
    4. Lesko S,
    5. DeVoe JE
    . The future of family medicine version 2.0: reflections from Pisacano scholars. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(1):142–150.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Ash AS,
    2. Mick E
    . UMass risk adjustment project for MassHealth payment and care delivery reform: Describing the 2017 payment model. UMASS Medical School Center for Health Policy and Research. http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/eohhs/healthcare-reform/masshealth-innovations/1610-umass-modeling-sdh-summary-report.pdf. Published Oct 11, 2016. Accessed Jan 17, 2017.
  27. ↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Service delivery innovation profile: Medical “extensivists” care for high-acuity patients across settings, leading to reduced hospital use. AHRQ Health Care Innovations Exchange. https://innovations.ahrq.gov/profiles/medical-extensivists-care-high-acuity-patients-across-settings-leading-reduced-hospital-use. Published Dec 18, 2013. Accessed Oct 18, 2016.
    1. Choi YS,
    2. Billings JA
    . Changing perspectives on palliative care. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002;16(4):515–522;522–517.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hempstead K,
    2. Delia D,
    3. Cantor JC,
    4. Nguyen T,
    5. Brenner J
    . The fragmentation of hospital use among a cohort of high utilizers: implications for emerging care coordination strategies for patients with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care. 2014;52(Suppl 3):S67–S74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hewett N,
    2. Buchman P,
    3. Musariri J,
    4. et al
    . Randomised controlled trial of GP-led in-hospital management of homeless people (‘Pathway’). Clin Med (Lond). 2016;16(3):223–229.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Goroll AH,
    2. Hunt DP
    . Bridging the hospitalist-primary care divide through collaborative care. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):308–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. MACRA: Delivery system reform, Medicare payment reform. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html. Accessed Jan 2, 2017.
  31. ↵
    1. Kilian A,
    2. Hardin L
    . Cross-continuum tool is associated with reduced utilization and cost for frequent high-need users. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(2):189–200.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    National Academy of Medicine. Models of Care for High-Need Patients: A National Academy of Medicine Workshop sponsored by the Peterson Center on Healthcare. Washington, DC: Leadership Consortium for Value and Science-Driven Health Care, Keck Center of the National Academies; 2015.
  33. ↵
    National Institute for Health Care Management. NIHCM Foundation data brief: The concentration of healthcare spending. http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/DataBrief3%20Final.pdf. Published Jul 2012. Accessed Jan 2, 20172012.
  34. ↵
    1. Green L,
    2. Puffer J
    . Reimagining the personal physician: Perspectives from the Keystone IV conference. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016; 29(Suppl 1):S1–S11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Colwill JM,
    2. Frey JJ,
    3. Baird MA,
    4. Kirk JW,
    5. Rosser WW
    . Patient relationships and the personal physician in tomorrow’s health system: A perspective from the Keystone IV conference. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(suppl 1):S54–S59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Barnes K,
    3. Morris C,
    4. et al
    . The personal doctoring manifesto: A perspective from the Keystone IV conference. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(suppl 1):S64–S68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Waters RC,
    2. Stoltenberg M,
    3. Hughes LS
    . A countercultural heritage: Rediscovering the relationship-centered and social justice roots of family medicine: A perspective from the Keystone IV conference. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(suppl 1):S45–S48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Nordin T,
    3. Kelly K,
    4. et al
    . Having and being a personal physician: vision of the Pisacano scholars. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(4):463–468.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Stange KC
    . The generalist approach. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3): 198–203.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Fins JJ
    . The expert-generalist: a contradiction whose time has come. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1010–1014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Phillips RL Jr.
    More comprehensive care among family physicians is associated with lower costs and fewer hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(3):206–213.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (4)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (4)
Vol. 15, Issue 4
July/August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Chief Primary Care Medical Officer: Restoring Continuity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Chief Primary Care Medical Officer: Restoring Continuity
Noemi Doohan, Jennifer DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2017, 15 (4) 366-371; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2078

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
The Chief Primary Care Medical Officer: Restoring Continuity
Noemi Doohan, Jennifer DeVoe
The Annals of Family Medicine Jul 2017, 15 (4) 366-371; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2078
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON PATIENTS
    • A CREATIVE SOLUTION: THE CHIEF PRIMARY CARE MEDICAL OFFICER
    • AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN THE SHIFT TO VALUE-BASED CARE
    • LET’S MAKE PRIMARY CARE WHOLE AGAIN
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In This Issue: Trends, Prescribing, Deprescribing
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Do I Return to the Community That Traumatized Me?
  • The Joy and Grief of Knowing Your Patient
  • The Face of God Revealed
Show more Reflections

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Other research types:
    • Health policy
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Continuity
    • Coordination / integration of care
  • Other topics:
    • Communication / decision making

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • continuity of patient care
  • hospital administration

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine