Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Multimedia
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief (Plain Language Summaries)
    • Call for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
NewsFamily Medicine UpdatesF

A PHYSICIAN SCIENTIST PATHWAY IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAMS

Chyke A. Doubeni, Ardis Davis, Janice L. Benson and Bernard Ewigman; on behalf of the ADFM Research Development Committee
The Annals of Family Medicine November 2017, 15 (6) 589-590; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2160
Chyke A. Doubeni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ardis Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janice L. Benson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernard Ewigman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Background

In the specialty of family medicine, a consensus is emerging nationally on the need for a greater focus on increasing research capacity to match a well-established culture of clinical and educational excellence.1–4 However, increasingly competitive extramural funding threatens the pipeline of physician-scientists in the United States,5 particularly for family medicine, which lags behind other specialties in competitive federal funding for investigator-initiated research.2

Development of the Research Pathway

In response to the need for a more robust pipeline of future family medicine-scientists, the board of the Association of Departments of Family Medicine (ADFM) adopted a strategic goal in 2013 to assist departments to strengthen the productivity and quality of their research that was reaffirmed in 2015.6 The ADFM Research Development Committee (RDC) then assessed the needs, capacity, and programs for advancing research in the specialty. This involved an environmental scan with extensive stakeholder consultations, roundtable discussions at the Winter 2017 ADFM meeting, and analysis of published and unpublished data. The stakeholders included the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), department chairs, program directors, and research leaders.

In a 2017 CAFM Educational Research Alliance survey,7 44% (n=43) of department chairs who responded reported ‘minimal’ or ‘no’ research activities in their departments and 34% (n=33) reported ‘significant’ or ‘extensive’ research activities. We found that a research pathway through the National Resident Match Program (match) “R3” system is an established mechanism in some other specialties for recruiting medical students with concurrent interests in a research career and the clinical specialty. A year-long process of key stakeholder engagement culminated in the development of a proposal for a Family Medicine Physician Scientist Pathway Program (PSP). The ADFM then conducted a member survey in 2017 in which, among 111 respondents, 83 (75%) expressed interest in the concept. Thus, the need, interest, and capacity all appear to be present for conducting a pilot of the PSP.

Features of the Program

The goal of the PSP is to expand opportunities for medical students interested in pursuing a family medicine research career beyond current fellowship programs and help accelerate the growth of research capacity. The PSP differs from current research experiences in family medicine residency programs.2,8 It would offer up to five years of integrated clinical and research training during residency, including rigorous methodological training in quantitative and qualitative research, and scientific writing leading to high-quality peer-reviewed publications and competitive NIH-type grant applications. Trainees would acquire the skills necessary for an independent research career and academic leadership through mentored research, formal research training, and structured leadership development. In the workforce context, the PSP would serve as a programmatic vehicle to:

  • Provide opportunities for medical students interested in a research career in family medicine a structured training pathway for board-certification and research leadership

  • Enrich the clinical learning environment for all residents by inculcating a culture of research and strengthening or complementing other fellowship programs

  • Increase capacity in the specialty for bridging gaps in policy, practice, and advocacy

  • Broaden the pool of applicants to family medicine

The following were some key recommendations that emerged during the consultations to develop the PSP:

  1. The PSP should be piloted to assess feasibility and sustainability and establish optimal sequencing of clinical and research experiences during training

  2. PSP residents should be fully integrated with traditional clinical residents

  3. The program director must verify to the ABFM that a PSP trainee has met the clinical training requirements for board certification.

  4. There should be flexibility in how residents enter or exit the program, but continuity in both clinical and research training should be required.

  5. The pilot should be offered in two tracks to allow residents to enter through the NRMP or, alternatively, during the first two years of residency for those who later develop interest in the pathway.

  6. Trainees should complete a master’s degree in a relevant field and methodologic area.

  7. Up to five departments with demonstrated access to mentors and methodological experts should be chosen to participate in the pilot program.

  8. Program implementation should be overseen by a steering committee of senior leaders and stakeholders. Success of the pilot should be evaluated on recruitment and retention, program completion rate, trainee career choices, peer reviewed publications, and funded grants.

The RDC, which developed the PSP, agrees that strong family medicine research is critical for the nation’s health,2 and has received approval from the ABFM to implement the PSP as a pilot program. We invite comments from all interested parties on this proposed program which can be accessed from the homepage of the ADFM at: www.adfm.org. Comments should be forwarded to Chyke Doubeni at: Chyke. Doubeni{at}uphs.upenn.edu.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Stacy Potts, MD, Residency Program Director, Barre Family Health Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School; Stephen Ratcliffe, MD, Program Director, Lancaster General Health, University of Pennsylvania Health System; and Courtney Summers, MSW, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, for their helpful advice and support in developing the concept for the program. We thank James C. Puffer, M.D. and Robert Phillips, M.D., M.S.P.H. of the American Board of Family Medicine for their advice and generous guidance in developing the PSP concept proposal.

Footnotes

  • ADFM Research Development Committee Members: Bernard Ewigman (Chair); Chyke A. Doubeni (Vice Chair); Bengt Arnetz; Mark Johnson; Diane Harper; Vickie Humphreys; Daniel A. Knight; Tony Kuzel; Dave Schneider; Roger Zoorob

  • © 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wender RC
    . Family medicine in the research revolution. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(4):431–439.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bowman MA,
    2. Lucan SC,
    3. Rosenthal TC,
    4. Mainous AG 3rd.,
    5. James PA
    . Family Medicine Research in the United States From the late 1960s Into the Future. Fam Med. 2017;49(4):289–295.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ewigman B,
    2. Chen F,
    3. Davis A,
    4. et al
    . The Building Research Capacity (BRC) Initiative: To Be Launched at the 2016 Annual Napcrg Meeting. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(6):585–586.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. deGruy FV 3rd.,
    2. Ewigman B,
    3. DeVoe JE,
    4. et al
    . A Plan for Useful and Timely Family Medicine and Primary Care Research. Fam Med. 2015;47(8):636–642.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    The Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group. Physician-Scientist Workforce (PSW) Report 2014. https://report.nih.gov/Work-force/PSW/psw-group.aspx.
  5. ↵
    Association of Departments of Family Medicine Strategic Plan 2015–2018. 2015; http://www.adfm.org/Portals/50/Documents/ADFM%20Strategic%20Plan%202015-2018_revSept2015.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2017.
  6. ↵
    The CAFM Educational Research Alliance (CERA). http://www.stfm.org/Research/CERA.
  7. ↵
    1. Brown SR,
    2. Miser WF
    . Meeting Scholarly Activity Requirements in a Family Medicine Residency Program. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(5): 487–488.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (6)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 15 (6)
Vol. 15, Issue 6
November/December 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A PHYSICIAN SCIENTIST PATHWAY IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAMS
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A PHYSICIAN SCIENTIST PATHWAY IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAMS
Chyke A. Doubeni, Ardis Davis, Janice L. Benson, Bernard Ewigman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 15 (6) 589-590; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2160

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
A PHYSICIAN SCIENTIST PATHWAY IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY TRAINING PROGRAMS
Chyke A. Doubeni, Ardis Davis, Janice L. Benson, Bernard Ewigman
The Annals of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 15 (6) 589-590; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2160
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Background
    • Development of the Research Pathway
    • Features of the Program
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PROGRESS ON A PILOT PROGRAM OF RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENT DURING RESIDENCY
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Core Outcomes of Residency Training 2022 (Provisional)
  • A Call to Leadership
  • Fifth International Conference on Practice Facilitation (ICPF) Focuses on Building Resilience and Promoting Professional Wellness
Show more Family Medicine Updates

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Multimedia
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Multimedia
  • Supplements
  • Online First
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2023 Annals of Family Medicine