Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Online First
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • The Issue in Brief
    • Past Issues in Brief
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Media
    • Job Seekers
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Email Alerts
    • Journal Club
  • Contact
    • Feedback
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
    • Associate Editor Opening
    • Current Opportunities
    • Job Board
  • COVID-19
    • Preprint Collection
    • Casenotes Blog
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal ResearchA

Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care

Morhaf Al Achkar, Ian M. Bennett, Lydia Chwastiak, Theresa Hoeft, Tre Normoyle, Melinda Vredevoogd and Davis G. Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine September 2020, 18 (5) 438-445; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2561
Morhaf Al Achkar
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alachkar@uw.edu
Ian M. Bennett
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lydia Chwastiak
2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa Hoeft
2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tre Normoyle
3Valley View Health Center, Chehalis, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melinda Vredevoogd
2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davis G. Patterson
1Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

If you would like to comment on this article, click on Submit a Response to This article, below. We welcome your input.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • RE: Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care
    Jordan M. Saeed, Jessica Hua, Jacob T. Hughes, Vanessa G. Jerger, Vikas Manjunath, Silpa C. Raju, Steven K. Szymanski, Diana Tang and Kyle Wong
    Published on: 16 December 2020
  • Published on: (16 December 2020)
    RE: Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care
    • Jordan M. Saeed, Medical Student, University of Illinois College of Medicine Rockford
    • Other Contributors:
      • Jessica Hua, Medical Student
      • Jacob T. Hughes, Medical Student
      • Vanessa G. Jerger, Medical Student
      • Vikas Manjunath, Medical Student
      • Silpa C. Raju, Medical Student
      • Steven K. Szymanski, Medical Student
      • Diana Tang, Medical Student
      • Kyle Wong, Medical Student

    The overall purpose of this study was to examine a novel model for providing mental health care in the rural primary care setting. The model involved a consulting psychiatrist that reviewed cases and provided education to case managers and physicians. The study authors believed this model would lead to improved care and serve as a continual training opportunity to build a skilled workforce. This is of particular importance in underserved rural communities.

    The group felt that the model was reliant on physician buy-in as it required more work of the primary care physician and a better understanding of their limitations. We felt that this was a potential pitfall in the model’s widespread use or was at least a factor that should be considered prior to implementation. We thought that primary care was an appropriate setting for this model as most mental health care begins at the primary office and are particularly important in rural settings.

    This study was a qualitative study that utilized semi-structured interviews at 2 rural sites in Washington that had successfully implemented this method. Interviews of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, care managers, and ancillary staff were completed and themes from the interviews were developed. There was some initial discussion in the group about the fact that only well-performing sites were selected. However, we decided that because this was a pilot study using qualitative methods to examine the model, selecting wel...

    Show More

    The overall purpose of this study was to examine a novel model for providing mental health care in the rural primary care setting. The model involved a consulting psychiatrist that reviewed cases and provided education to case managers and physicians. The study authors believed this model would lead to improved care and serve as a continual training opportunity to build a skilled workforce. This is of particular importance in underserved rural communities.

    The group felt that the model was reliant on physician buy-in as it required more work of the primary care physician and a better understanding of their limitations. We felt that this was a potential pitfall in the model’s widespread use or was at least a factor that should be considered prior to implementation. We thought that primary care was an appropriate setting for this model as most mental health care begins at the primary office and are particularly important in rural settings.

    This study was a qualitative study that utilized semi-structured interviews at 2 rural sites in Washington that had successfully implemented this method. Interviews of primary care physicians, psychiatrists, care managers, and ancillary staff were completed and themes from the interviews were developed. There was some initial discussion in the group about the fact that only well-performing sites were selected. However, we decided that because this was a pilot study using qualitative methods to examine the model, selecting well-performing sites made sense.

    The investigators found several themes that were common among each group interviewed. The broad themes were: learning more about mental health, working with others, and communication. Based on these themes the model was reconfigured to better represent the bidirectionality of the learning that was occurring. Learning was also conceptualized as formal learning (simulations, lectures, and instructional activities) and informal learning (mentoring, trial-and-error, self-directed learning, and networking). The roles of each group were also further refined which the authors felt was particularly important for future implementation of the model. Our discussion of the new model revolved around the fact that we felt it better represented what was occurring based on the interviews. There was mention that because the model was changed based on the two sites studied it could make it less applicable to other sites of implementation. This point led to further discussion that there may be several subtypes of this model. We also discussed how we would like to know how sites performed prior to implementing this model. Our thought was that if they performed well prior to the intervention it was likely they would perform well again, and this knowledge could help differentiate the effect of the model vs. the people in the model.

    This study concluded that the model provided continuous learning at the sites it was implemented. The group felt the fact concrete examples of learning were provided was especially important to support this conclusion. While we felt the model increased learning there was some skepticism regarding its widespread adoption. It was noted that certain personality types may better succeed in the model and buy-in is required from all members of the care team. The study authors felt investigating less successful applications of this model would provide further insight into the model. We agreed with this assessment and felt that was an important future study direction and would help determine which locations this model would work best at.

    We felt this model was especially well suited for rural healthcare. The primary care doctors would be able to learn from the specialists and provide better care to their patients. Patients would save both time and money. They would not have to spend time going to see numerous specialists if they received their care from their primary doctor and would also save the increased cost of specialist visits. We believe this model could be adapted to other areas beyond mental health and that the needs of the community would be able to govern the specialists that are utilized. A particular area of need that came up in our discussion was pain management in rural communities.

    The researchers noted that future studies should investigate the implementation of this model in a wider variety of sites and how this model addresses common problems such as staff turnover. We discussed the first point earlier and agreed that further investigation of this model was warranted. We discussed how every model is going to require new staff to learn their role and how to interact with the other team members. We also talked about how this issue could be minimized by incorporating transitions and continual training into the model. The group discussed how it would be interesting to have future studies to investigate if there is a role that is most important for the model to succeed.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 18 (5)
The Annals of Family Medicine
Vol. 18, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care
Morhaf Al Achkar, Ian M. Bennett, Lydia Chwastiak, Theresa Hoeft, Tre Normoyle, Melinda Vredevoogd, Davis G. Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 18 (5) 438-445; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2561

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Telepsychiatric Consultation as a Training and Workforce Development Strategy for Rural Primary Care
Morhaf Al Achkar, Ian M. Bennett, Lydia Chwastiak, Theresa Hoeft, Tre Normoyle, Melinda Vredevoogd, Davis G. Patterson
The Annals of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 18 (5) 438-445; DOI: 10.1370/afm.2561
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Recruiting, Educating, and Taking Primary Care to Rural Communities
  • Evaluation of Qualitative Study Investigating Telepsychiatric Consultation Model
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical Practice Variation Among Primary Care Physicians: 1 Decade, 14 Health Services, and 3,238,498 Patient-Years
  • Pregnancy Medicaid Improvements in a Nonexpansion State After the Affordable Care Act
  • Diagnostic Agreement Between Telemedicine on Social Networks and Teledermatology Centers
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Domains of illness & health:
    • Chronic illness
    • Mental health
  • Methods:
    • Qualitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Core values of primary care:
    • Access
    • Coordination / integration of care
  • Other topics:
    • Education
    • Organizational / practice change

Keywords

  • rural health services
  • mental health
  • telepsychiatry
  • remote consultation
  • telemedicine
  • consultation
  • collaborative care
  • primary care
  • depression
  • patient care team
  • vulnerable populations

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Past Issues in Brief
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Online First

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Media
  • Job Seekers

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2021 Annals of Family Medicine