Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Meeting ReportSocial determinants and vulnerable populations

“If they’re going to ask the questions, they need to address concerns”: Clinical screening for social determinants of health

Susan Veldheer, Kenneth Houser, Brianna Hoglen, Andrea Hobkirk, Michael Hayes, William Curry and Sophia Allen
The Annals of Family Medicine April 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2784; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.2784
Susan Veldheer
RD, DEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Houser
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brianna Hoglen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Hobkirk
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Hayes
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Curry
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophia Allen
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Context: The National Academy of Medicine endorses screening for social determinants of health (SDoH); however, questions remain on how providers and/or hospitals should address SDoH once collected.

Objective: To gather patient perspectives on provider obligations when collecting SDoH data in cancer treatment settings.

Study design: For this mixed-methods study, participants reviewed the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risk, and Experiences (PRAPARE) and completed individual qualitative interviews that were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by 3 coders (Cohen’s Kappa > 0.85).

Population studied: Cancer patients (n=21) in the Penn State Cancer Institute catchment area.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome included clinical obligations after collecting SDoH data.

Results: Participants were 50% F, 86% white, with a mean age of 52.5. 33% were in current cancer treatment. Collectively, gathering SDoH was considered beneficial to cancer treatment outcomes but clinicians should acknowledge individual circumstances. They stated, “...I just think if they’re going to ask the questions, they need to address concerns. Yeah. That’s my biggest thing. If you’re going to ask the question, then you need to acknowledge it with the patient… And don’t just do it to put it in the chart and never talk about it.” Resources advocated for included access to food, housing, and transportation. “…Find out what resources they would be eligible for, what can help them get back and forth to appointments, co-pay issues….because they’re out there... we need to pull them and implement them.” This emphasizes the need for clinicians to act on information shared by patients. Participants also noted that stress and emotional well-being are critical considerations while undergoing cancer treatment. They noted, “I would feel more comfortable if they would acknowledge my emotional status.” Further, “It’s been proven that stress can bring on cancer and it can make the cancers worse… If you’re stressed because you don’t have food or you don’t have transportation or you can’t pay your bills, it’s hurting your treatment.”

Conclusions: The presence of SDoH, such as elevated levels of stress and compromised emotional well-being, reinforce the value of access to supportive care services during cancer treatment. Well-designed SDoH surveys should include questions that are both actionable and tied to resources that address a patient’s most pressing social needs.

  • © 2021 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 20 (Supplement 1)
Vol. 20, Issue Supplement 1
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“If they’re going to ask the questions, they need to address concerns”: Clinical screening for social determinants of health
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
“If they’re going to ask the questions, they need to address concerns”: Clinical screening for social determinants of health
Susan Veldheer, Kenneth Houser, Brianna Hoglen, Andrea Hobkirk, Michael Hayes, William Curry, Sophia Allen
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2784; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2784

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
“If they’re going to ask the questions, they need to address concerns”: Clinical screening for social determinants of health
Susan Veldheer, Kenneth Houser, Brianna Hoglen, Andrea Hobkirk, Michael Hayes, William Curry, Sophia Allen
The Annals of Family Medicine Apr 2022, 20 (Supplement 1) 2784; DOI: 10.1370/afm.20.s1.2784
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The effect of being uninsured on cancer screening practices in Puerto Rico
  • The impact of COVID-19 on gender-based intimate partner violence : a scoping review
  • Patient experience with Social Prescribing Program in Ontario, Canada
Show more Social determinants and vulnerable populations

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine