Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Annals of Family Medicine
  • My alerts
Annals of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Access
    • Multimedia
    • Podcast
    • Collections
    • Past Issues
    • Articles by Subject
    • Articles by Type
    • Supplements
    • Plain Language Summaries
    • Calls for Papers
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Job Seekers
    • Media
  • About
    • Annals of Family Medicine
    • Editorial Staff & Boards
    • Sponsoring Organizations
    • Copyrights & Permissions
    • Announcements
  • Engage
    • Engage
    • e-Letters (Comments)
    • Subscribe
    • Podcast
    • E-mail Alerts
    • Journal Club
    • RSS
    • Annals Forum (Archive)
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Follow annalsfm on Twitter
  • Visit annalsfm on Facebook
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Are Patients’ Ratings of Their Physicians Related to Health Outcomes?

Peter Franks, Kevin Fiscella, Cleveland G. Shields, Sean C. Meldrum, Paul Duberstein, Anthony F. Jerant, Daniel J. Tancredi and Ronald M. Epstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2005, 3 (3) 229-234; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.267
Peter Franks
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Fiscella
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cleveland G. Shields
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean C. Meldrum
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Duberstein
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony F. Jerant
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Tancredi
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald M. Epstein
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Patients and Physicians in Study and Comparison Practices

    CharacteristicsEnrolled PhysiciansNot Enrolled Physicians
    MCO = managed care organization.
    * Socioeconomic variables derived from patient Zip code linked to 1990 US census data. Information is based on 1996 to 1999 claims data.
    Patients
    Number121,806483,094
    Age, y, mean (SD)41.0 (11.0)41.1 (11.2)
    Sex, % female53.952.7
    Income, US$, median (SD)*37,830 (10,683)36,874 (10,160)
    High school graduate, %, mean (SD)*64.8 (7.8)63.8 (7.9)
    Any visit to a physician, %83.182.5
    Percentage of patients referred25.725.6
    Years enrolled in the MCO, mean (SD)3.07 (1.12)3.07 (1.12)
    Annual adherence indicators, %
        Women with Papanicolaou tests52.551.8
        Women >40 y with mammograms46.246.2
        Diabetic with eye examinations47.046.4
        Diabetic with glycohemoglobin tests67.066.1
        Diabetic with cholesterol tests54.754.5
    Per-patient costs in 1996 dollars; mean, median (SD)
        Diagnostic testing189,19.6 (521)196, 23.6 (513)
        Inpatient254, 0 (4,702)264, 0 (4,038)
        Total costs938, 228 (5,493)950, 228 (4,914)
    Physicians
        Number100594
        Specialty, % family practice4724
        Patients in panel, No. (SD)1,218 (758)813 (776)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of Patients Responding to Survey Instrument

    CharacteristicPatients Responding No. (%)Mean (SD)
    Note: Survey data were available for patients of only 96 physicians.
    MCS-12 = Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 mental component summary score; PCS-12 = Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 physical component summary score; HCCQ = Health Care Climate Questionnaire; PCAS = Primary Care Assessment Survey.
    Total4,746 (100)
    Sex
        Missing41 (0.9)
        Female2,955 (62.3)
        Male1,750 (36.9)
    Patient race/ethnicity
        Missing34 (0.7)
        African American499 (10.5)
        Hispanic109 (2.3)
        Other110 (2.3)
        White3,994 (84.2)
    Patient education
        Missing21 (0.4)
        <12 y337 (7.1)
        12th grade1,370 (28.9)
        1–3 y of college1,490 (31.4)
        4 y of college828 (17.4)
        Graduate school700 (14.7)
    Length of patient-doctor relationship
        Missing12 (0.3)
        <1 y360 (7.6)
        1–3 y1,035 (21.8)
        3–5 y814 (17.2)
        >5 y2,525 (53.2)
    Age, y4,680 (98.6)44.9 (12.1)
    Number of conditions4,746 (100)2.3 (1.5)
    MCS-12 score4,458 (93.9)48.8 (10.5)
    PCS-12 score4,458 (93.9)46.0 (11.1)
    Somatization scale4,724 (99.5)7.6 (6.5)
    HCCQ scpre4,733 (99.7)18.0 (3.1)
    PCAS—knowledge4,734 (99.7)15.1 (4.3)
    PCAS—trust4,744 (100)34.1 (4.0)
    Patient satisfaction scale4,729 (99.6)5.2 (0.8)
    Health status change4,720 (99.5)0.0 (0.92)

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • The Article in Brief

    Background: Past research has suggested that a doctor�s style of interacting with the patient can influence a patient�s health. This study used detailed methods of analyzing data to reexamine the question of whether patient ratings of their doctors are related to patient ratings of changes in their own health.
    What This Study Found: A doctor�s style of interacting with patients is not related to reported changes in health. The results of past research might have been influenced by patient characteristics. For example, patients with similar characteristics might go to the same doctors. Also patients who tend to rate their doctors highly might also tend to report better health. By using different methods of analyzing data, this study was able to eliminate the influence of patient characteristics on the study results. The results then show that there is not a relationship between a doctor�s style and patient health.
    Implications:
    * It is difficult to prove that a doctor�s style influences patient health.
    * Past research has suggested that a doctor�s style which is centered around patient participation in care is best. This assumption may stand in the way of research into other beneficial ways of interacting with patients.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (3)
The Annals of Family Medicine: 3 (3)
Vol. 3, Issue 3
1 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • In Brief
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Annals of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Are Patients’ Ratings of Their Physicians Related to Health Outcomes?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Annals of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Annals of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Are Patients’ Ratings of Their Physicians Related to Health Outcomes?
Peter Franks, Kevin Fiscella, Cleveland G. Shields, Sean C. Meldrum, Paul Duberstein, Anthony F. Jerant, Daniel J. Tancredi, Ronald M. Epstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2005, 3 (3) 229-234; DOI: 10.1370/afm.267

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Get Permissions
Share
Are Patients’ Ratings of Their Physicians Related to Health Outcomes?
Peter Franks, Kevin Fiscella, Cleveland G. Shields, Sean C. Meldrum, Paul Duberstein, Anthony F. Jerant, Daniel J. Tancredi, Ronald M. Epstein
The Annals of Family Medicine May 2005, 3 (3) 229-234; DOI: 10.1370/afm.267
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Patients' Commitment to Their Primary Physician and Why It Matters
  • Ratings of Physician Communication by Real and Standardized Patients
  • Patient-Centered Communication and Diagnostic Testing
  • In This Issue: Bursting the Bubble on Chronic Disease Management, the Meaning of Healing, PBRN Methods Supplement, and the Annals' 2-Year Anniversary
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family-Based Interventions to Promote Weight Management in Adults: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India
  • Teamwork Among Primary Care Staff to Achieve Regular Follow-Up of Chronic Patients
  • Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Methods:
    • Quantitative methods
  • Other research types:
    • Professional practice
  • Other topics:
    • Patient perspectives

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Early Access
  • Plain-Language Summaries
  • Multimedia
  • Podcast
  • Articles by Type
  • Articles by Subject
  • Supplements
  • Calls for Papers

Info for

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Job Seekers
  • Media

Engage

  • E-mail Alerts
  • e-Letters (Comments)
  • RSS
  • Journal Club
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Subscribe
  • Family Medicine Careers

About

  • About Us
  • Editorial Board & Staff
  • Sponsoring Organizations
  • Copyrights & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • eLetter/Comments Policy

© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine