Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1
Family Usual Source of Care (USC) Patterns for US Children Aged 0 to 17 Years Living With at Least 1 Parent, 2002–2007
Family USC Patterns Unweighted Na Yearly Average Weighted to US Populationb (in millions) Weighted %b (95% CI) Cross-sectional: 6 groups Child yes USC USC: yes parent(s) 34,360 47.5 66.9 (65.6–68.1) USC: yes 1 parent/no 1 parent 6,894 8.3 11.7 (11.0–12.3) USC: no parent(s) 8,487 8.8 12.4 (11.7–13.1) Child no USC USC: yes parent(s) 841 1.0 1.3 (1.2–1.5) USC: yes 1 parent/no 1 parent 788 0.8 1.2 (1.0–1.3) USC: no parent(s) 4,932 4.6 6.5 (6.0–7.1) Total 56,302 70.9 100.0 Cross-sectional: 4 groups Child yes USC USC: yes parent(s) 41,254 55.7 78.6 (77.5–79.6) USC: no parent(s) 8,487 8.8 12.4 (11.7–13.1) Child no USC USC: yes parent(s) 1,629 1.8 2.5 (2.3–2.8) USC: no parent(s) 4,932 4.6 6.5 (6.0–7.1) Total 56,302 70.9 100.0 -
Source: 2002–2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Household Component.
-
Note: Column percentages may not equal 100% because of rounding (rounded to nearest 10th).
-
↵a Unweighted counts represent total number of children, aged 0–17 years, from MEPS-respondent households with a positive person weight who could be linked to at least 1 parent within the household. Total counts do not include 2,049 children with no parent identified in the household. Total also excludes 437 children for whom USC status could not be ascertained for the child or the parent.
-
↵b To derive the yearly population estimates, each child record from the MEPS was weighted according to person-level weights provided by the data collection agency.
-
- Table 2
Characteristics Associated With Different Cross-Sectional Family Usual Source of Care (USC) Patterns for US Children Aged 0 to 17 Years Living With at Least 1 Parent, 2002–2007
Cross-Sectional Family USC Patterns: 4 Groups (Does Not Account for Discordant Parent Status) Characteristics All Children USC: Yes Child/Yes Parent(s) USC: Yes Child/No Parent USC: No Child/Yes Parent(s) USC: No Child/No Parent No. in samplea 56,302 41,254 8,487 1,629 4,932 Household income group, % FPLb,c >400% 28.8 31.9 18.5 18.9 15.0 200% to <400% 33.1 34.4 26.7 34.0 29.4 125% to <200% 15.8 14.6 19.4 22.1 21.5 100% to <125% 5.4 4.7 7.7 7.3 8.3 <100% 17.0 14.5 27.7 17.8 25.7 Child’s age, y, %b 0–4 27.4 26.7 39.5 12.9 17.7 5–9 27.4 27.5 28.7 18.7 26.0 10–13 22.4 22.6 18.8 23.7 25.3 14–17 22.9 23.2 12.9 44.7 31.0 Child’s race/ethnicity, %b,d White, non-Hispanic 58.9 63.1 46.1 44.9 38.1 Hispanic, any race 19.7 16.5 29.4 25.6 37.0 Nonwhite, non-Hispanic 21.4 20.4 24.5 29.5 25.0 Family composition, %b,e 1 Parent in household 26.2 23.5 38.6 24.7 36.8 2 Parents in household 73.8 76.6 61.4 75.3 63.2 At least 1 parent completed high school, % Yes 85.9 88.6 77.9 78.2 71.9 No 14.1 11.4 22.1 21.8 28.1 Geographic residence, %b Northeast 17.5 19.8 10.3 8.2 6.9 West 24.4 23.3 25.4 28.6 33.4 South 35.9 33.0 47.6 45.8 45.4 Midwest 22.2 23.9 16.7 17.4 14.3 Child’s insurance status, %b Full year insured 81.8 85.7 76.9 64.1 50.9 Insurance gap 11.4 9.2 16.4 18.5 24.6 Full year uninsured 6.8 5.1 6.6 17.4 24.6 Parent’s insurance status, %b Insured all year (at least 1 parent) 75.6 82.1 51.6 68.8 45.4 Not insured all year 24.4 17.9 48.5 31.2 54.6 Child health status, %b Excellent/very good 82.3 83.3 78.5 82.5 78.2 Good/fair/poor 17.7 16.7 21.5 17.5 21.8 -
FPL = federal poverty level; MEPS-HC = Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component.
-
Source: 2002–2007 MEPS-HC.
-
Note: Column percentages are weighted and may not equal 100% because of rounding (rounded to nearest 10th). P <.05 in χ3 test comparisons of overall differences between subgroups of each covariate and insurance patterns.
-
↵a Unweighted counts represent total number of children, aged 0–17 years, from MEPS-HC respondent households with a positive person weight who could be linked to at least 1 parent within the household. Total counts do not include 2,049 children with no parent identified in the household; cross-sectional total also excludes 437 children for whom self or parental USC status could not be ascertained.
-
↵b To derive yearly population estimates, each child record from MEPS-HC was weighted according to person-level weights provided by the data collection agency.
-
↵c Household income groups were based on MEPS-HC–constructed variable that divides families into 5 income groups based on earnings as a percentage of federal poverty level (FPL), and in 2007, the federal poverty level for a family of 4 was $20,650.37
-
↵d Child’s race/ethnicity based on responses to standard options provided by MEPS-HC interviewers. We created 1 child race/ethnicity variable by combining a race variable (which included white only, black only, American Indian/Alaskan Native only, Asian only, native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander only, and multiple races) and an ethnicity variable (which included Hispanic, or not Hispanic).
-
↵e Family composition refers to whether the child could be linked to 1 parent (n = 17,612) or 2 parents (n = 38,690) residing in the same household (does not account for biological relationship between parent and child or the marriage status between the 2 parents).
-
- Table 3
Univariate Associations Between Cross-Sectional Family Usual Source of Care (USC) Patterns and Children’s Receipt of Health Care Services, 2002–2007
Outcomes All Children Weighted % (95% CI)a USC: Yes Child/Yes Parent(s) Weighted % (95% CI)a USC: Yes Child/No Parent Weighted % (95% CI)a USC: No Child/Yes Parent(s) Weighted % (95% CI)a USC: No Child/No Parent Weighted % (95% CI)a Cross-sectional: 4 groups No. in sampleb 56,302 41,254 8,487 1,629 4,932 Child had insurance coverage gap 18.2 (17.4–19.1) 14.3 (13.6–15.1) 23.1 (21.2–25.1) 35.9 (32.0–40.0) 49.1 (46.3–52.0) No doctor visits in past year 23.0 (22.2–23.9) 19.1 (18.3–19.9) 22.6 (20.9–24.4) 54.6 (51.0–58.1) 58.9 (56.4–61.4) No dental visits at least yearly 27.6 (26.7–28.4) 24.7 (23.9–25.6) 37.3 (35.2–39.3) 35.6 (31.9–39.5) 40.1 (37.5–42.7) Unmet medical or prescription needc 1.4 (1.2–1.6) 1.1 (0.9–1.2) 2.1 (1.5–3.1) 2.5 (1.6–4.0) 3.6 (2.8–4.6) Delayed cared 31.0 (30.0–32.0) 30.2 (29.2–31.2) 33.1 (30.9–35.5) 33.8 (29.0–38.9) 40.6 (37.1–44.1) Problems getting caree 15.6 (14.8–16.5) 14.5 (13.7–15.4) 17.8 (15.5–20.4) 28.1 (22.2–34.8) 31.4 (27.0–36.3) Cross-sectional: 4 groups No. in sampleb 50,602 37,175 7,201 1,566 4,660 Past 2 years Did not receive all 4 preventive counseling items (missing >1)f,g 83.2 (82.4–84.0) 82.0 (81.0–83.0) 85.4 (83.8–86.8) 90.2 (87.2–92.5) 90.8 (89.0–92.3) Did not receive any of 4 preventive counseling items (missing all 4)f 39.8 (38.8–40.9) 37.2 (36.1–38.3) 40.0 (37.6–42.4) 62.5 (58.6–66.3) 61.6 (59.2–63.9) Lifetime Did not receive all 4 preventive counseling items (missing >1)f,h 80.0 (78.9–80.9) 78.6 (77.4–79.6) 82.9 (81.3–84.5) 87.1 (83.8–89.8) 87.9 (85.9–89.6) Did not receive any of 4 preventive counseling items (missing all 4)f 33.4 (32.3–34.5) 31.0 (29.9–32.1) 33.8 (31.6–36.1) 53.5 (49.5–57.5) 52.8 (50.2–55.5) -
Source: 2002–2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component (MEPS-HC).
-
Note: P <.05 in χ3 test comparisons of overall differences between insurance pattern subgroups and all outcome measures.
-
↵a To derive the yearly population estimates, each child record from the MEPS-HC was weighted according to person-level weights provided by the data collection agency.
-
↵b Unweighted counts represent total number of children, aged 0–17 years, from MEPS-HC–respondent households with a positive person weight who could be linked to at least 1 parent within the household. Total counts do not include 2,049 children with no parent identified in the household. Total also excludes 437 children for whom USC status could not be ascertained for the child and/or parent.
-
↵c Unmet medical or prescription need was defined as being unable to get medical care and/or prescription medications when needed within the past year.
-
↵d Delayed care was defined as parental report that child did not always get care as soon as was wanted for an illness, injury, or condition that needed care right away; or did not always get an appointment for routine health care as soon as was wanted.
-
↵e Problems getting care was defined as parent reporting a big or small problem that child did not receive needed medical or prescription treatment; a big or small problem to get the child care, tests, or treatment a parent or doctor believed necessary; or a big or small problem to see a specialist the child needed to see.
-
↵f The preventive counseling services include MEPS-HC items that asked parents whether a doctor or health care clinician had advised their child about the importance of (1) healthy eating, (2) routine exercise, (3) use of car safety seats/booster seats/seat belts, and (4) use of a helmet while riding a tricycle/bicycle.
-
↵g In the past 2 years among all children, 39.8% were missing all 4 preventive counseling items; 16.7% were missing 3 items; 15.3% were missing 2 items; 11.4% were missing 1 item (16.8% had received all 4 items).
-
↵h Over a lifetime among all children, 33.4% were missing all 4 preventive counseling items; 16.9% were missing 3 items; 16.5% were missing 2 items; 13.2% were missing 1 item (20.1% had received all 4 items).
-
- Table 4
Multivariate Associations Between Child and Family Characteristics and Children’s Access to Health Care (2002–2007)
Demographic and Other Characteristics Child Health Insurance Coverage Gap aRR (95% CI) No Doctor Visits in Past 12 Moa aRR (95% CI) Child Dentist Visits <1/yb aRR (95% CI) Unmet Medical or Prescription Needc aRR (95% CI) Delayed Cared aRR (95% CI) Problems Getting Caree aRR (95% CI) Family USC patterns USC: yes child/yes parent(s)f 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 USC: yes child/no parent 1.33 (1.21–1.47)g 1.11 (1.02–1.21)g 1.12 (1.06–1.18)g 1.70 (1.09–2.65)g 1.00 (0.93–1.08) 1.06 (0.91–1.23) USC: no child/yes parent(s) 2.15 (1.92–2.41)g 2.19 (2.02–2.38)g 1.40 (1.28–1.52)g 1.63 (0.98–2.69) 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 1.65 (1.32–2.07)g USC: no child/no parent 2.82 (2.60–3.04)g 2.35 (2.22–2.50)g 1.38 (1.30–1.47)g 2.00 (1.51–2.66)g 1.19 (1.08–1.32)g 1.70 (1.45–2.00)g Household income group, % FPL >400%f 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 200% - <400% 1.57 (1.40–1.76)g 1.47 (1.37–1.58)g 1.26 (1.19–1.33)g 1.91 (1.30–2.80)g 1.03 (0.97–1.09) 1.25 (1.11–1.41)g 125% to <200% 2.09 (1.86–2.35)g 1.63 (1.49–1.77)g 1.44 (1.34–1.55)g 2.13 (1.51–3.01)g 1.03 (0.95–1.11) 1.31 (1.15–1.50)g 100% to <125% 2.05 (1.76–2.39)g 1.66 (1.51–1.84)g 1.42 (1.30–1.56)g 2.32 (1.42–3.81)g 1.07 (0.96–1.18) 1.36 (1.12–1.64)g <100% 1.67 (1.47–1.91)g 1.60 (1.46–1.75)g 1.40 (1.30–1.51)g 2.19 (1.50–3.20) g 1.09 (1.00–1.19) 1.50 (1.29–1.74)g Child’s age, y 0–4f 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5–9 0.99 (0.92–1.06) 2.12 (1.98–2.29)g 0.22 (0.21–0.24)g 1.38 (1.07–1.78)g 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 1.05 (0.96–1.16) 10–13 1.05 (0.97–1.13) 2.39 (2.20–2.58)g 0.20 (0.19–0.22)g 1.26 (0.90–1.76) 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.06 (0.94–1.19) 14–17 1.06 (0.98–1.15) 2.50 (2.32–2.69)g 0.30 (0.28–0.32)g 1.48 (1.06–2.07)g 1.09 (1.02–1.16)g 1.16 (1.04–1.30)g Child’s race/ethnicity White, non- Hispanicf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hispanic, any race 1.34 (1.23–1.47)g 1.17 (1.09–1.26)g 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.56 (0.40–0.78)g 1.09 (1.01–1.17)g 1.07 (0.96–1.18) Nonwhite, non-Hispanic 0.86 (0.77–0.95)g 1.24 (1.16–1.32)g 1.00 (0.95–1.05) 0.74 (0.57–0.97)g 1.04 (0.98–1.11) 1.06 (0.94–1.19) Family composition 2 Parents in householdf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Parent in household 1.09 (1.01–1.18)g 0.92 (0.88–0.97)g 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 1.19 (0.92–1.54) 1.07 (1.02–1.13) g 1.03 (0.93–1.14) At least 1 parent completed high school Yesf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1.14 (1.04–1.25)g 1.22 (1.14–1.30)g 1.19 (1.12–1.26)g 0.82 (0.62–1.07) 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 0.87 (0.77–1.00) Geographic residence Northeast (reference group) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 West 1.26 (1.10–1.44)g 1.68 (1.48–1.90)g 1.14 (1.04–1.24)g 0.99 (0.64–1.52) 1.31 (1.19–1.44)g 1.10 (0.94–1.28) South 1.38 (1.21–1.57)g 1.39 (1.23–1.57)g 1.14 (1.05–1.23)g 0.98 (0.70–1.36) 1.12 (1.02–1.23)g 0.93 (0.81–1.06) Midwest 1.13 (0.99–1.29) 1.42 (1.25–1.61)g 1.12 (1.02–1.22)g 1.00 (0.70–1.43) 1.19 (1.08–1.31)g 0.90 (0.77–1.05) Parent’s insurance status Insured all year (at least 1)f N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Not insured all year N/A 1.03 (0.97–1.09) 0.97 (0.91–1.03) 1.14 (0.89–1.46) 1.08 (1.01–1.15) 1.11 (0.99–1.25) Child’s insurance status Insured all yearf N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial year insurance N/A 1.19 (1.11–1.27)g 1.37 (1.29–1.45)g 2.65 (2.11–3.33)g 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 1.28 (1.13–1.46)g Full year uninsured N/A 1.47 (1.37–1.59)g 1.80 (1.69–1.91)g 3.47 (2.69–4.46)g 1.00 (0.90–1.11) 1.49 (1.29–1.73)g Child health status Excellent/very goodf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Good/fair/poor 1.03 (0.97–1.09) 0.74 (0.70–0.79)g 1.09 (1.05–1.14)g 2.35 (1.87–2.96)g 1.26 (1.19–1.32)g 1.68 (1.54–1.83)g -
Source: 2002–2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component.
-
aRR = adjusted risk ratio; FPL = federal poverty level; USC = usual source of care.
-
↵a Yearly doctor visits were chosen as an unmet need variable because the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends yearly preventive pediatric health care visits up to age 21 years.32
-
↵b American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommends yearly dental visits begin at time of first tooth and no later than 12 months of age.33
-
↵c Unmet medical or prescription need was defined as being unable to get medical care and/or prescription medications when needed within the past year.
-
↵d Delayed care was defined as parental report that child did not always get care as soon as was wanted for an illness, injury, or condition that needed care right away; or did not always get an appointment for routine health care as soon as was wanted.
-
↵e Problems getting care was defined as parent reporting a big or small problem that the child did not receive needed medical or prescription treatment; a big or small problem to get the child care, tests, or treatment a parent or doctor believed necessary; or a big or small problem to see a specialist the child needed to see.
-
↵f Reference group.
-
↵g P <.05.
-
- Table 5
Multivariate Associations Between Child and Family Characteristics and Children’s Receipt of Preventive Counseling (2002–2007)
Past 2 Years Lifetime Demographic and Other Characteristics Did Not Receive All 4 Preventive Counseling Items (Missing ≥1)a aRR (95% CI) Did Not Receive Any of 4 Preventive Counseling Itemsa aRR (95% CI) Did Not Receive All 4 Preventive Counseling Items (Missing ≥1)a aRR (95% CI) Did Not Receive Any of 4 Preventive Counseling Itemsa aRR (95% CI) Family USC patterns USC: yes child/yes parent(s)b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 USC: yes child/no parent 1.03 (1.01–1.05)c 1.07 (1.01–1.14)c 1.04 (1.01–1.06)c 1.06 (0.99–1.13) USC: no child/yes parent(s) 1.07 (1.03–1.11)c 1.49 (1.38–1.61)c 1.08 (1.04–1.12)c 1.52 (1.39–1.66)c USC: no child/no parent 1.08 (1.05–1.11)c 1.47 (1.40–1.55)c 1.09 (1.06–1.12)c 1.49 (1.39–1.60)c Household income group, % FPL >400%b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 200% - <400% 1.05 (1.02–1.07)c 1.23 (1.17–1.30)c 1.05 (1.03–1.08)c 1.27 (1.19–1.35)c 125% to <200% 1.04 (1.01–1.07)c 1.24 (1.16–1.32)c 1.06 (1.03–1.09)c 1.31 (1.21–1.41)c 100% to <125% 1.03 (1.00–1.07) 1.22 (1.12–1.33)c 1.04 (1.01–1.08)c 1.27 (1.15–1.40)c <100% 1.02 (0.99–1.05) 1.17 (1.10–1.25)c 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 1.23 (1.14–1.33)c Child’s age, y 2–4b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5–9 0.97 (0.96–0.99)c 1.35 (1.29–1.42)c 0.95 (0.93-.096)c 1.27 (1.21–1.35)c 10–13 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 1.52 (1.44–1.61)c 0.96 (0.94–0.98)c 1.43 (1.34–1.51)c 14–17 1.06 (1.04–1.07)c 1.70 (1.61–1.81)c 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 1.55 (1.44–1.65)c Child’s race/ethnicity White, non-Hispanicb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hispanic, any race 0.95 (0.93–0.97)c 0.88 (0.83–0.93)c 0.95 (0.93–0.98)c 0.94 (0.89–1.00) Nonwhite, non-Hispanic 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.96 (0.91–1.02) 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 1.02 (0.96–1.09) Family composition 2 Parents in householdb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Parent in household 1.02 (1.01–1.04)c 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 1.03 (1.01–1.04)c 0.98 (0.94–1.04) At least 1 parent completed high school Yesb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 1.09 (1.04–1.15)c 1.01 (0.99–1.04) 1.12 (1.06–1.19)c Geographic residence Northeastb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 West 1.10 (1.06–1.14)c 1.40 (1.26–1.56)c 1.08 (1.03–1.13)c 1.29 (1.14–1.46)c South 1.12 (1.08–1.16)c 1.37 (1.24–1.52)c 1.12 (1.08–1.16)c 1.31 (1.16–1.47)c Midwest 1.11 (1.07–1.15)c 1.36 (1.22–1.51)c 1.11 (1.07–1.16)c 1.29 (1.14–1.46)c Parent’s insurance status Insured all year (at least 1 parent)b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Not insured all year 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 1.02 (0.97–1.07) 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 1.03 (0.98–1.09) Child’s insurance status Insured all yearb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Partial year insurance 1.04 (1.01–1.06)c 1.11 (1.06–1.18)c 1.04 (1.01–1.06)c 1.10 (1.03–1.17)c Full year uninsured 1.05 (1.02–1.08)c 1.23 (1.15–1.31)c 1.05 (1.02–1.08)c 1.20 (1.11–1.29)c Child health status Excellent/very goodb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Good/fair/poor 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.90 (0.86–0.94)c 1.02 (1.00–1.04) 0.92 (0.88–0.96)c -
aRR = adjusted risk ratio; FPL = federal poverty level; USC = usual source of care.
-
Source: 2002–2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component (MEPS-HC).
-
↵a The preventive counseling services include MEPS-HC items that asked parents whether a doctor or health care clinician had advised their child about the importance of (1) healthy eating, (2) routine exercise, (3) use of care safety seats/booster seats/seat belts, and (4) use of a helmet while riding a tricycle/bicycle.
-
↵b Reference group.
-
↵c P <.05.
-
Additional Files
The Article in Brief
Parent and Child Usual Source of Care and Children's Receipt of Health Care Services
Jennifer E. DeVoe, and colleagues
Background Children with a usual source of health care (USC) have better access to care, which may contribute to better health. This study examines whether children's access to health care services is associated with their parents' USC status.
What This Study Found In this study, more than 18% of children have no parent in the household with a USC. Children who have a USC, but whose parents do not, are more likely to have unmet medical needs, including an insurance coverage gap, an unmet medical or prescription need, and no yearly dental visits.
Implications
- The authors call for policy changes to improve access to a usual source of care for all family members.
- The authors suggest that clinicians develop practice-based interventions to assist parents and children in finding stable usual sources of care.