PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Michèle Aubin AU - Lucie Vézina AU - René Verreault AU - Sébastien Simard AU - Éveline Hudon AU - Jean-François Desbiens AU - Lise Fillion AU - Serge Dumont AU - André Tourigny AU - Serge Daneault TI - Continuity of Cancer Care and Collaboration Between Family Physicians and Oncologists: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial AID - 10.1370/afm.2643 DP - 2021 Mar 01 TA - The Annals of Family Medicine PG - 117--125 VI - 19 IP - 2 4099 - http://www.annfammed.org/content/19/2/117.short 4100 - http://www.annfammed.org/content/19/2/117.full SO - Ann Fam Med2021 Mar 01; 19 AB - PURPOSE Collaboration between family physicians (FPs) and oncologists can be challenging. We present the results of a randomized clinical trial of an intervention designed to improve continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration, as perceived by patients with lung cancer and their FPs.METHODS The intervention included (1) supplying FPs with standardized summaries related to each patient, (2) recommending that patients see their FP after receiving the cancer diagnosis, (3) supplying the oncology team with patient information resulting from FP visits, and (4) providing patients with priority access to FPs as needed. A total of 206 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 104) or control group (n = 102), and 86.4% of involved FPs participated. Perceptions of continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration were assessed every 3 months for patients and at baseline and at the end of the study for FPs. Patient distress and health service utilization were also assessed.RESULTS Patients and FPs in the intervention group perceived better interprofessional collaboration (patients: P <.0001; FPs: P = .0006) than those in the control group. Patients reported better informational continuity (P = .001) and management continuity (P = .05) compared to the control group, but no differences were found for FPs (information: P = .22; management: P = .13). No effect was found with regard to patient distress or health service utilization.CONCLUSIONS This intervention improved patient and FP perception of interprofessional collaboration, but its effectiveness on continuity of care was less clear for FPs than for patients. Additional strategies should be considered to sustainably improve continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration.