PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Švab, Igor
TI  - Changing Research Culture
AID  - 10.1370/afm.150
DP  - 2004 May 01
TA  - The Annals of Family Medicine
PG  - S30--S34
VI  - 2
IP  - suppl 2
4099  - http://www.annfammed.org/content/2/suppl_2/S30.short
4100  - http://www.annfammed.org/content/2/suppl_2/S30.full
SO  - Ann Fam Med2004 May 01; 2
AB  - Although there is general agreement that family medicine has a lot to offer to the health care system, the academic dimension is still not widely understood. There are two main reasons why family medicine needs to develop its scientific potential: to address the true nature of the discipline, and to help in its recognition. The academic establishment benefits from academic family medicine by gaining new questions that are necessary to be answered and by gaining new research approaches. Many problems are encountered when introducing family medicine into the academic arena. Two main strategies for developing family medicine research can be identified. The first is to adapt to the existing structure of the academic world by claiming equal rights with the developed disciplines, collaborating with other university departments in their research projects, publishing articles in established journals, and participating in established faculty development programs. The other, more demanding, strategy is to introduce changes to the academic arena by developing specific research questions, by collaborating on research within family medicine, and by developing family medicine’s own success criteria for academic excellence. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive. The World Organization of Family Doctors plays an important role in supporting both approaches through its international affiliations and contacts with policy makers.