TY - JOUR T1 - Effective Facilitator Strategies for Supporting Primary Care Practice Change: A Mixed Methods Study JF - The Annals of Family Medicine JO - Ann Fam Med SP - 414 LP - 422 DO - 10.1370/afm.2847 VL - 20 IS - 5 AU - Shannon M. Sweeney AU - Andrea Baron AU - Jennifer D. Hall AU - David Ezekiel-Herrera AU - Rachel Springer AU - Rikki L. Ward AU - Miguel Marino AU - Bijal A. Balasubramanian AU - Deborah J. Cohen Y1 - 2022/09/01 UR - http://www.annfammed.org/content/20/5/414.abstract N2 - PURPOSE Practice facilitation is an evidence-informed implementation strategy to support quality improvement (QI) and aid practices in aligning with best evidence. Few studies, particularly of this size and scope, identify strategies that contribute to facilitator effectiveness.METHODS We conducted a sequential mixed methods study, analyzing data from EvidenceNOW, a large-scale QI initiative. Seven regional cooperatives employed 162 facilitators to work with 1,630 small or medium-sized primary care practices. Main analyses were based on facilitators who worked with at least 4 practices. Facilitators were defined as more effective if at least 75% of their practices improved on at least 1 outcome measure—aspirin use, blood pressure control, smoking cessation counseling (ABS), or practice change capacity, measured using Change Process Capability Questionnaire—from baseline to follow-up. Facilitators were defined as less effective if less than 50% of their practices improved on these outcomes. Using an immersion crystallization and comparative approach, we analyzed observational and interview data to identify strategies associated with more effective facilitators.RESULTS Practices working with more effective facilitators had a 3.6% greater change in the mean percentage of patients meeting the composite ABS measure compared with practices working with less effective facilitators (P <.001). More effective facilitators cultivated motivation by tailoring QI work and addressing resistance, guided practices to think critically, and provided accountability to support change, using these strategies in combination. They were able to describe their work in detail. In contrast, less effective facilitators seldom used these strategies and described their work in general terms. Facilitator background, experience, and work on documentation did not differentiate between more and less effective facilitators.CONCLUSIONS Facilitation strategies that differentiate more and less effective facilitators have implications for enhancing facilitator development and training, and can assist all facilitators to more effectively support practice changes. ER -