TY - JOUR T1 - Practice-Based Referrals to a Tobacco Cessation Quit Line: Assessing the Impact of Comparative Feedback vs General Reminders JF - The Annals of Family Medicine JO - Ann Fam Med SP - 135 LP - 142 DO - 10.1370/afm.650 VL - 5 IS - 2 AU - William C. Wadland AU - Jodi Summers Holtrop AU - David Weismantel AU - Pramod K. Pathak AU - Huda Fadel AU - Jeff Powell Y1 - 2007/03/01 UR - http://www.annfammed.org/content/5/2/135.abstract N2 - PURPOSE We undertook a study to assess the impact of comparative feedback vs general reminders on practice-based referrals to a tobacco cessation quit line and estimated costs for projected quit responses. METHODS We conducted a group-randomized clinical trial comparing the impact of 6 quarterly (18 months) feedback reports (intervention) with that of general reminders (control) on practice-based clinician referrals to a quit-line service. Feedback reports were based on an Achievable Benchmark of Care approach using baseline practice, clinician, and patient survey responses, and referrals per quarter. Comparable quit responses and costs were estimated. RESULTS Three hundred eight clinicians participated (171 family medicine, 88 internal medicine, 49 obstetrics-gynecology) from 87 primary care practices in Michigan. After 18 months, there were more referrals from the intervention than from the control practices (484 vs 220; P <.001). Practice facsimile (fax) referrals (84%, n = 595) exceeded telephone referrals (16%, n = 109), but telephone referrals resulted in greater likelihood of enrollment (77% telephone vs 44% fax, P <.001). The estimated number of smokers who quit based on the level of services utilized by referred smokers was 66 in the feedback and 36 in the gentle reminder practices. CONCLUSION Providing comparative feedback on clinician referrals to a quit-line service had a modest impact with limited increased costs. ER -