PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Aaron J. Trachtenberg
AU  - Natalia Dik
AU  - Dan Chateau
AU  - Alan Katz
TI  - Inequities in Ambulatory Care and the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Respiratory Hospitalizations: A Population-Based Study of a Canadian City
AID  - 10.1370/afm.1683
DP  - 2014 Sep 01
TA  - The Annals of Family Medicine
PG  - 402--407
VI  - 12
IP  - 5
4099  - http://www.annfammed.org/content/12/5/402.short
4100  - http://www.annfammed.org/content/12/5/402.full
SO  - Ann Fam Med2014 Sep 01; 12
AB  - PURPOSE Individuals of lower socioeconomic status have higher rates of hospitalization due to ambulatory care–sensitive conditions, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. We examined whether differences in patient demographics, ambulatory care use, or physician characteristics could explain this disparity in avoidable hospitalizations. METHODS Using administrative data from the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, we identified all adults aged 18 to 70 years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, grouped together as obstructive airway disease. We divided patients into census-derived income quintiles using average household income. We performed a series of multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine how the association of socioeconomic status with the risk of obstructive airway disease–related hospitalizations changed after controlling for blocks of covariates related to patient demographics (socioeconomic status, age, sex, and comorbidity), ambulatory care use (continuity influenza vaccination and specialist referral), and characteristics of the patient’s usual physician (eg, payment mechanism, sex, years in practice). RESULTS We included 34,741 patients with obstructive airway disease, 729 (2.1%) of whom were hospitalized with a related diagnosis during a 2-year period. Patients having a lower income were more likely to be hospitalized than peers having the highest income, and this effect of socioeconomic status remained virtually unchanged after controlling for every other variable studied. In a fully adjusted model, patients in the lowest income quintile had approximately 3 times the odds of hospitalization relative to counterparts in the highest income quintile (odds ratio = 2.93; 95% confidence limits: 2.19, 3.93). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of universal health care, the income-based disparity in hospitalizations for respiratory ambulatory care–sensitive conditions cannot be explained by factors directly related to the use of ambulatory services that can be measured using administrative data. Our findings suggest that we look beyond the health care system at the broader social determinants of health to reduce the number of avoidable hospitalizations among the poor.