RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Depressive Disorders in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis JF The Annals of Family Medicine JO Ann Fam Med FD American Academy of Family Physicians SP 56 OP 68 DO 10.1370/afm.1719 VO 13 IS 1 A1 Linde, Klaus A1 Sigterman, Kirsten A1 Kriston, Levente A1 Rücker, Gerta A1 Jamil, Susanne A1 Meissner, Karin A1 Schneider, Antonius YR 2015 UL http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/1/56.abstract AB PURPOSE We performed a systematic review of the currently available evidence on whether psychological treatments are effective for treating depressed primary care patients in comparison with usual care or placebo, taking the type of therapy and its delivery mode into account. METHODS Randomized controlled trials comparing a psychological treatment with a usual care or a placebo control in adult, depressed, primary care patients were identified by searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PsycINFO up to December 2013. At least 2 reviewers extracted information from included studies and assessed the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were performed using posttreatment depression scores as outcome. RESULTS A total of 30 studies with 5,159 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with control, the effect (standardized mean difference) at completion of treatment was −0.30 (95% CI, −0.48 to −0.13) for face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), −0.14 (−0.40 to 0.12) for face-to-face problem-solving therapy, −0.24 (−0.47 to −0.02) for face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy, −0.28 (−0.44 to −0.12) for other face-to-face psychological interventions, −0.43 (−0.62 to −0.24) for remote therapist-led CBT, −0.56 (−1.57 to 0.45) for remote therapist-led problem-solving therapy, −0.40 (−0.69 to −0.11) for guided self-help CBT, and −0.27 (−0.44 to −0.10) for no or minimal contact CBT. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that psychological treatments are effective in depressed primary care patients. For CBT approaches, substantial evidence suggests that interventions that are less resource intensive might have effects similar to more intense treatments.