RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Nurturing collaboration between non-profit organizations and primary healthcare partners: An instrumental case study
JF The Annals of Family Medicine
JO Ann Fam Med
FD American Academy of Family Physicians
SP 6303
DO 10.1370/afm.22.s1.6303
VO 22
IS Supplement 1
A1 Dumont-Samson, Olivier
A1 Hudon, Émilie
A1 Breton, Mylaine
A1 Jacques, Marie-Claude
A1 Loignon, Christine
A1 Hudon, Catherine
YR 2024
UL http://www.annfammed.org/content/22/Supplement_1/6303.abstract
AB Context: People living in precarious socio-economic conditions are at greater risk of developing mental and physical health disorders, and of having complex healthcare and social needs (hereafter complex needs). Appropriate care for these people calls for integrated care from the healthcare, social services, and community networks. Few studies assessed the factors influencing cross-sectoral collaboration between non-profit organizations (NPOs) and primary healthcare partners.Objectives: To identify challenges and facilitators to collaborations between a NPO and primary healthcare partners.Study design: An instrumental case study design.Setting: A NPO and its partners in the healthcare (primary care clinics), social services, and community networks in a rural context.Population studied: Key informants involved in intersectoral collaborations: people with complex needs (n=2), healthcare and social services professionals (n=10), managers (n=7), board of directors’ members (n=2), support staff (n=1).Methods: Data collection: Non-participant observation (n=14 meetings; n=2 clinical sessions) and semi-structured interviews (n=22).Analysis: Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.Outcome measures: Challenges and facilitators influencing intersectoral collaborations.Results: The organizational context created tensions between the NPO and their partners that must present “good statistics” to receive optimal financial resources. This climate of competition was not conducive to collaboration. Clear and complementary service offers could reduce those tensions. A fragmented vision led to major conflicts, so shared vision among stakeholders was helpful to promote collaboration. Impressions and unspoken words escalated into interpersonal conflicts when communication was poor. Clear communication was then essential not only for aligning visions, but also for building healthy interpersonal relationships and mutual trust, key to successful collaborations. Trained staff, in sufficient numbers, who remain stable over time, also helped building relationships and trust between qualified individuals from different organizations.Conclusions: Intersectoral collaboration between NPOs andprimary healthcare partners raised many challenges. Potential conflicts linked to financial competition, a fragmented vision or false impressions were gradually resolved with open communication and efforts to understand others’ perspective.