Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants (N = 262)

CharacteristicApp-Treatment (n = 131)aUsual Care (n = 131)a
Age, mean (SD), y53.2 (12.8)51.3 (10.3)
Body mass index, mean (SD), kg/m227.6 (5.5)28.0 (5.2)
Higher educational level, No. (%)b53 (52.0)48 (51.6)
≥1 Vaginal births, No. (%)111 (85.4)105 (80.2)
Postmenopausal, No. (%)64 (49.2)59 (45.0)
Recruitment type, No. (%)
    General practitioner76 (58.0)76 (58.0)
    Lay press or social media55 (42.0)55 (42.0)
Duration of UI, median (IQR), y7 (4-14)8 (4-13)
Type of UI, No. (%)
    Stress50 (38.2)60 (45.8)
    Mixed, stress predominant37 (28.2)33 (25.2)
    Urgency12 (9.2)10 (7.6)
    Mixed, urgency predominant32 (24.4)28 (21.4)
Previous treatment for UI, No. (%)
    None99 (76.2)95 (72.5)
    Pessary0 (0)1 (0.8)
    Physical therapist31 (23.8)35 (26.7)
Incontinence severity
    ICIQ-UI-SF score, mean (SD)c9.5 (3.2)10.3 (3.4)
    ICIQ-LUTS-QoL score, mean (SD)d33.9 (8.3)33.4 (7.8)
UI episodes per day, median (IQR)1.0 (0.33-2.33)1.0 (0.33-2.33)
  • app = application; ICIQ-LUTS-QoL = International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire lower urinary tract symptoms quality of life; ICIQ-UI-SF = ICIQ Urinary Incontinence Short Form; IQR = interquartile range; UI = urinary incontinence.

  • aNumber for analysis ranged from 102 to 131 for the app-treatment group and from 93 to 131 for the usual care group. Some data were missing for the baseline assessment (1 patient) and the baseline questionnaires (3 patients).

  • bAssessed at follow-up. Higher: third-level education (vs lower: high school or less).

  • cPossible range of scores: 0-21. Higher scores correlate with worse incontinence.

  • dPossible range of scores: 19-76. Higher scores correlate with a greater impact of incontinence on quality of life.