Characteristics of Study Sites and Participants
Site Characteristics (N = 5) | Participant Roles (N = 23) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | Geographic Setting | Payer Type Serving Population | Dominant Population Served | Participation in State Demonstration Programa | Administrators, No. | Screeners/Implementers, No. |
1 | Rural | Mix of insurance | White | Yes (Linkages, SIM) | 1 | 3 |
2 | Rural | Medicaid | White, young families, older adults | Yes (Linkages) | 1 | 4 |
3 | Urban | Medicaid | Black, Hispanic, undocumented immigrants | No (Diabetes grant) | 1 | 5 |
4 | Rural/suburban | Mix of insurance | Black, White | Yes (Linkages) | 1 | 2 |
5 | Urban/suburban | Medicaid | Black | Yes (Pathways, Linkages) | 1 | 4 |
SIM = State Innovation Model.
Note: Geographic setting, dominant population served, and demonstration program participation were self-reported by administrator and supplemented by site visits.
↵a Several state programs promoting social needs screening were implemented during the study period, including the Linking Clinical Care with Community Supports (Linkages) project, the Michigan Pathways to Better Health (Pathways), and the State Innovation Model (SIM), as described under “Context and Setting” in Supplemental Appendix 1, available at https://www.AnnFamMed.org/content/19/4/xxx/suppl/DC1/.