Cooperative | Region Served | No. of Participating Practices | Study Design |
---|---|---|---|
Midwest | Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana | 226 | Parallel cluster randomized triala |
New York City | New York City | 276 | SW-CRT |
North Carolina | North Carolina | 228 | SW-CRT |
Northwest | Washington, Oregon, Idaho | 209 | 2×2 parallel randomized factorial trialb |
Oklahoma | Oklahoma | 226 | SW-CRT |
Southwest | Colorado, New Mexico | 202 | Parallel cluster randomized trialc |
Virginia | Virginia | 208 | SW-CRT |
SW-CRT = stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.
↵a This parallel cluster randomized trial had 4 waves with 2 intervention arms in each wave (intervention and intervention plus), which included additional support. Practices were recruited in 4 separate waves, and waves began at staggered times.
↵b The 2×2 randomized factorial trial had 2 factors (factor A and factor B), each with an on and off level potentially added to the standard level, leading to 4 study conditions. Practices were recruited up front, and all arms followed the same timeline.
↵c This parallel cluster randomized trial had 2 intervention arms (1 standard and 1 enhanced), which included additional support. Practices were recruited up front, and both arms followed the same timeline.