Table 1.

Overview of Cooperatives

CooperativeRegion ServedNo. of Participating PracticesStudy Design
MidwestWisconsin, Illinois, Indiana226Parallel cluster randomized triala
New York CityNew York City276SW-CRT
North CarolinaNorth Carolina228SW-CRT
NorthwestWashington, Oregon, Idaho2092×2 parallel randomized factorial trialb
OklahomaOklahoma226SW-CRT
SouthwestColorado, New Mexico202Parallel cluster randomized trialc
VirginiaVirginia208SW-CRT
  • SW-CRT = stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

  • a This parallel cluster randomized trial had 4 waves with 2 intervention arms in each wave (intervention and intervention plus), which included additional support. Practices were recruited in 4 separate waves, and waves began at staggered times.

  • b The 2×2 randomized factorial trial had 2 factors (factor A and factor B), each with an on and off level potentially added to the standard level, leading to 4 study conditions. Practices were recruited up front, and all arms followed the same timeline.

  • c This parallel cluster randomized trial had 2 intervention arms (1 standard and 1 enhanced), which included additional support. Practices were recruited up front, and both arms followed the same timeline.