Table 5.

Major Themes and Subthemes From Program Director Interviews

Theme and SubthemesRespondents, No. (%)
Influence
Internal
    Content driven by residents2 (15.4)
    Personal relationships3 (23.1)
    Content driven by program director7 (53.8)
External
    Proximity of clinics6 (46.2)
    Patient population10 (76.9)
    Standardization11 (84.6)
    Organizational influences5 (38.5)
    Funding/grants2 (15.4)
Training strategies
Materials used
    Literature6 (46.2)
    Experiential content10 (76.9)
    Standards7 (53.8)
    Screening tools7 (53.8)
Teaching personnel
    Interprofessional3 (23.1)
    Medical2 (53.8)
    Dental6 (46.2)
    Behavioral health9 (69.2)
    Public health official2 (15.4)
    Community health worker1 (7.7)
Method of content delivery
    Presentation11 (84.6)
    Direct patient care10 (76.9)
    Research project1 (7.7)
    Webinar2 (15.4)
    Community interaction2 (15.4)
    Interprofessional sessions4 (30.8)
Location of teaching
    Classroom12 (92.3)
    Clinical setting10 (76.9)
    Online2 (15.4)
When/how much in curriculum
    Training boot camp before start of residency2 (15.4)
    Uniformly throughout the year4 (30.8)
    Once a year2 (15.4)
    Amount of time in curriculum5 (38.5)
Training outcomes
Evaluation technique
    Observation in a clinical setting6 (46.2)
    Preevaluation and postevaluation1 (7.7)
    Postcourse examination1 (7.7)
    No evaluation1 (7.7)
    Observation in nonclinical setting2 (15.4)
Impact
    Treating patients comprehensively5 (38.5)
    Opportunities to participate as part of the interprofessional team1 (7.7)
    Make clinicians more empathetic2 (15.4)
    Share expertise in their future communities1 (7.7)
    Understand the role played by the dentist1 (7.7)
    Inclusive practice1 (7.7)
Training output—success
Quantify success
    Feedback from faculty and staff1 (7.7)
    Alumni questionnaire1 (7.7)
    Feedback from residents1 (7.7)
    Presenting at meetings1 (7.7)
    Awards1 (7.7)
    Models adopted elsewhere1 (7.7)
    Change in clinician practices1 (7.7)
    Successful treatment of patients with minimal supervision1 (7.7)
    Feedback from patients1 (7.7)
Contributors to success
    Physical proximity to physicians1 (7.7)
    Foundational relationships3 (23.1)
    Interest from resident1 (7.7)
    Various teaching methodology1 (7.7)
    Supportive leadership1 (7.7)
    Grants/funding1 (7.7)
    Faculty and staff3 (23.1)
    Program structure2 (15.4)
    State dental society1 (7.7)
    State government1 (7.7)
Reasons for training strategies
Teaching personnel
    Using subject matter experts2 (15.4)
Method of content delivery
    Rooted in patient care3 (23.1)
Competencies used/not used
    Current competencies ambiguous1 (7.7)
Barriers
    Not important to residents4 (30.8)
    Lack of faculty expertise/subject matter knowledge6 (46.2)
    Patient population4 (30.8)
    No referral source3 (23.1)
    Covered by state licensure1 (7.7)
    No reimbursement in organized dentistry1 (7.7)
    Culture7 (53.9)
    Organizational barrier4 (30.8)
    Cost1 (7.7)
    Time10 (76.9)
    Miscellaneous1 (7.7)
Solutions to barriers
    Educate around stigma, for cultural change1 (7.7)
    Collaborate with subject matter expert1 (7.7)
    Pique resident interest1 (7.7)
Reflections
    Incorporate new training methods1 (7.7)
    Understands future potential of content inclusion in curriculum3 (23.1)
  • Note: Based on responses of 13 program directors.