Test Characteristics of the Marburg Heart Score and the FP Assessment
Variable | ACS | No ACS | Total |
---|---|---|---|
MHS using a cut-off value of ≤2 | |||
MHS >2 | 27 | 84 | 111 |
MHS ≤2 | 9 | 66 | 75 |
Total | 36 | 150 | 186 |
Sensitivity: 75.0% (95% CI, 57.5-87.3) | Incidence ACS: 19.4% (95% CI, 14.1-25.9) | ||
Specificity: 44.0% (95% CI, 36.0-52.3) | Incidence No ACS: 80.6% (95% CI, 74.1-85.9) | ||
PPV: 24.3% (95% CI, 16.9-33.6) | OR: 2.36 (95% CI, 1.04-5.35) | ||
NPV: 88.0% (95% CI, 78.0-94.0) | χ2: 0.04 | ||
MHS using a cut-off value of ≤1 | |||
MHS >1 | 34 | 126 | 160 |
MHS ≤1 | 2 | 24 | 26 |
Total | 36 | 150 | 186 |
Sensitivity: 94.4% (95% CI, 80.0-99.0) | Incidence ACS: 19.4% (95% CI, 14.1-25.9) | ||
Specificity: 16.0% (95% CI, 10.7-23.1) | Incidence No ACS: 80.6% (95% CI, 74.1-85.9) | ||
PPV: 21.3% (95% CI, 15.4-28.6) | OR: 3.24 (95% CI, 0.73-14.39) | ||
NPV: 92.3% (95% CI, 73.4-98.7) | χ2: 0.11 | ||
FP probability assessment using a cut-off value of ≤5 | |||
FP probability assessment high (>5) | 39 | 116 | 155 |
FP probability assessment low (≤5) | 6 | 82 | 88 |
Total | 45 | 198 | 243 |
Sensitivity: 86.7% (95% CI, 72.5-94.5) | Incidence ACS: 18.5% (95% CI, 14.0-24.1) | ||
Specificity: 41.4% (95% CI, 34.5-48.6) | Incidence No ACS: 81.5% (95% CI, 75.9-86.0) | ||
PPV: 25.2% (95% CI, 18.7-32.9) | OR: 4.60 (95% CI, 1.86-11.36) | ||
NPV: 93.2% (95% CI, 85.2-97.2) | χ2: <0.01 | ||
Combined approach using the MHS and the FP assessments of probability | |||
MHS + FP probability assessment, 1-2a | 36 | 115 | 151 |
MHS + FP probability assessment, 0b | 0 | 35 | 35 |
Total | 36 | 150 | 186 |
Sensitivity: 100% (95% CI, 88.0-100) | Incidence ACS: 19.4% (95% CI, 14.1-25.9) | ||
Specificity: 23.3% (95% CI, 17.0-31.1) | Incidence No ACS: 80.6% (95% CI, 74.1-85.9) | ||
PPV: 23.8% (95% CI, 17.5-31.6) | |||
NPV: 100% (95% CI, 87.7-100) |
ACS = acute coronary syndrome; FP = family physician; MHS = Marburg Heart Score; NPV = negative predictive value; OR = odds ratio; PPV = positive predictive value.
↵a Either the MHS, the FP assessment, or both were positive using an MHS cut-off value of ≤2 and an FP assessment cut-off value of ≤5.
↵b Both the MHS and the FP assessments were negative.